ISOCPP sg16 List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Sunday, 31 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Hubert Tong

Saturday, 30 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for January 13th, 2021 Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Hubert Tong

Friday, 29 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Tom Honermann

Thursday, 28 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions JeanHeyd Meneide
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions JeanHeyd Meneide
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Peter Brett
[SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types Corentin
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions Peter Brett

Wednesday, 27 January 2021

[SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Peter Brett
[SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful? Corentin
Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set Jens Maurer
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for January 13th, 2021 Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set Hubert Tong

Tuesday, 26 January 2021

[SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set Jens Maurer
[SG16] SG16 telecon tomorrow, January 27th, Jonathan Müller to discuss Lexy Tom Honermann
[SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-27 Tom Honermann

Monday, 25 January 2021

Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Corentin
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Corentin
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Corentin
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Corentin
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Changes to Unicode UTS #18, Unicode Regular Expressions, level 3 (tailoring) dropped. Peter Brett
[SG16] String literals and diagnostics Corentin

Friday, 22 January 2021

[SG16] Changes to Unicode UTS #18, Unicode Regular Expressions, level 3 (tailoring) dropped. Tom Honermann
[SG16] Invitation: ISO C++ SG16 (Unicode) Telecon Tom Honermann via Standard C++ Foundation

Tuesday, 19 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Corentin Jabot

Wednesday, 13 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-13 Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 12 January 2021

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] Review of P2093R2: Formatted output Victor Zverovich
[SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-13 Tom Honermann

Saturday, 9 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems Victor Zverovich

Thursday, 7 January 2021

Re: [SG16] [std-proposals] P1885: Naming Text Encodings to Demystify Them: Note on the IANA registry Tom Honermann

Wednesday, 6 January 2021

Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020 Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020 Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020 Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 5 January 2021

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] Review of P2093R2: Formatted output Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] Review of P2093R2: Formatted output Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems Thiago Macieira
[SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020 Hubert Tong

Monday, 4 January 2021

Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases Peter Brett

Sunday, 3 January 2021

[SG16] 2nd draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature Tom Honermann

Last message date: 2021-01-31 15:48:31