C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-13

From: Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:23:17 -0500
For anyone planning to attend, please update your Zoom client.
Apparently Zoom made some changes recently to how the yes/no buttons
work and, depending on client version, they will only stay active for
10s or so.



On 1/12/21 11:01 AM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
> This is your friendly reminder that an SG16 telecon will be held
> tomorrow, Wednesday January 13th, at 19:30 UTC (timezone conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20210113T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>).
> This meeting will be conducted via Zoom. To attend, visit
> https://iso.zoom.us/j/8414530059 at the start of the meeting. Please
> contact me privately if necessary for the meeting password.
> The agenda is:
> * P2246R0: Character encoding of diagnostic text
> <https://wg21.link/p2246r0>
> o And companion paper: WG14 N2563: Character encoding of
> diagnostic text
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2563.pdf>
> * SG16, SG22, and WG14 coordination.
> o Priority and owners for SG16's open WG14 issues
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Awg14>.
> * WG14 N2620: Restartable and Non-Restartable Functions for
> Efficient Character Conversions | r4
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2620.htm>
> I hope you all enjoyed a good break over the New Year's holiday and
> are ready to dive back in to standards progression!
> We'll try to wrap up discussion and polling of P2246R0
> <https://wg21.link/p2246r0> in the first 30 minutes. Please read both
> P2246R0 <https://wg21.link/p2246r0> and WG14 N2563
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2563.pdf> prior to
> the telecon.
> Discussion of coordination with SG22 and WG14 is expected to be short;
> perhaps 15 minutes. Please review the SG16 open issues tagged as WG14
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3Awg14>
> ahead of time and consider whether you can offer assistance moving
> them along. In particular, I'd like to find owners for the WG14
> equivalents of P1949 <https://wg21.link/p1949> (C++ Identifier Syntax
> using Unicode Standard Annex 31) and P1041 <https://wg21.link/p1041>
> (Make char16_t/char32_t string literals be UTF-16/32).
> The remainder of the telecon will focus on socializing and reviewing
> JeanHeyd's work on WG14 N2620
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2620.htm>. This is
> a fairly long paper, so please set aside some time to read it. We
> won't delve into the proposed wording, but for the standardeze lovers
> out there, reading just the wording will give you a good sense of what
> the paper is about (but please try and read sections 2-4 as well).
> Polls to forward P2246R0 <https://wg21.link/p2246r0> to EWG are
> expected. Direction polls for WG14 N2620
> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2620.htm> may be taken.
> Tom.

Received on 2021-01-13 10:23:22