Corentin
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
Corentin Jabot
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
Hubert Tong
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for January 13th, 2021
- Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set
- Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020
- Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020
Jean-Marc Bourguet
JeanHeyd Meneide
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
Jens Maurer
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set
- Re: [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set
- [SG16] Unicode as the basic compiler character set
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
JF Bastien
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
Peter Brett
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] iconv-style interface for transcoding functions
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] Changes to Unicode UTS #18, Unicode Regular Expressions, level 3 (tailoring) dropped.
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
Steve Downey
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] Is the concept of basic execution character sets useful?
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] String literals and diagnostics
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
Thiago Macieira
Tom Honermann
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- Re: [SG16] Reinterpreting pointers of character types
- [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for January 13th, 2021
- [SG16] SG16 telecon tomorrow, January 27th, Jonathan Müller to discuss Lexy
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-27
- [SG16] Changes to Unicode UTS #18, Unicode Regular Expressions, level 3 (tailoring) dropped.
- Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-13
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2021-01-13
- Re: [SG16] [std-proposals] P1885: Naming Text Encodings to Demystify Them: Note on the IANA registry
- Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020
- Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for December 9th, 2020
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] Review of P2093R2: Formatted output
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] Review of P2093R2: Formatted output
- Re: [SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems
- [SG16] Execution encoding and the execution environment on Windows systems
- Re: [SG16] Handling literals throughout the translation phases
- [SG16] 2nd draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature