Saturday, 31 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
Friday, 30 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- [std-proposals] Standard support for different ABI's for class vtables
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
Thursday, 29 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- [std-proposals] D3724 Integer division
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] subtract with carry correction proposal
Wednesday, 28 May 2025
- [std-proposals] subtract with carry correction proposal
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- Re: [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- Re: [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- [std-proposals] Mark a class or an object as 'noexcept'
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Tuesday, 27 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Monday, 26 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
Sunday, 25 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Saturday, 24 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] The end iterator for a contiguous container
- Re: [std-proposals] The end iterator for a contiguous container
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] The end iterator for a contiguous container
- [std-proposals] The end iterator for a contiguous container
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Friday, 23 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch - perfect hashing
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] iota and sys_days
- [std-proposals] iota and sys_days
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- [std-proposals] Formatting code points to character names
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Thursday, 22 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
Wednesday, 21 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- [std-proposals] Finding the first/next set bit in a bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster access to std::bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster access to std::bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster access to std::bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster access to std::bitset
- [std-proposals] Faster access to std::bitset
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- [std-proposals] Hope that std::optional and comma expressions can work this way
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
Tuesday, 20 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- [std-proposals] A draft for modern switch
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- [std-proposals] attribute [[unevaluated]]
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
Sunday, 18 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
- Re: [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
- [std-proposals] Allow switch for std::meow_ordering
- Re: [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
- Re: [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
- [std-proposals] P3701R0 A concept for signed or unsigned integers
Saturday, 17 May 2025
Friday, 16 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- [std-proposals] P3695R0 Deprecate implicit conversions between char8_t, char16_t, and char32_t
- Re: [std-proposals] std::recurse
Thursday, 15 May 2025
Wednesday, 14 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 74, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 74, Issue 27
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 74, Issue 25
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- Re: [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
- [std-proposals] switch expression/matching switch expression
Monday, 12 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- [std-proposals] comparison between pointers and bool
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
Sunday, 11 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
Saturday, 10 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Friday, 9 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Thursday, 8 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Limited friendship
Wednesday, 7 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Limited friendship
- [std-proposals] Fwd: Limited friendship
- Re: [std-proposals] Limited friendship
- Re: [std-proposals] The limits of friendship
- Re: [std-proposals] Limited friendship
- [std-proposals] Limited friendship
- [std-proposals] The limits of friendship
Tuesday, 6 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Type trait std::is_structural
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] P3665 (Vertical Text Processing)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] P3665 (Vertical Text Processing)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] P3665 (Vertical Text Processing)
- Re: [std-proposals] P3665 (Vertical Text Processing)
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Monday, 5 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Sunday, 4 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Saturday, 3 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Friday, 2 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] P3549R0 Diverging expressions
- [std-proposals] P3549R0 Diverging expressions
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Guarantees over addresses from function pointers created from lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
Thursday, 1 May 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] noexcept has gotten a bit hairy -- I want a compiler error
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Low-level float parsing functions
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: Proposal: Integer division/remainder/division-remainder functions with exception throwing behavior