>
>
> > However, I find the idea to be generally useful, and maybe there's a
> version of this which authors would find much less objectionable. For
> example, it would be nice if you could search papers by the standard
> library symbols or keywords that they've added; e.g. if you could find
> P3411R2 by searching for "std::any_view", or P1024R3 by searching for
> "std::span::front". Paper tagging seems much more obviously like fair use
> than turning papers into an AI chatbot, but it's still a good use of
> machine learning.
>
> You can do such searches by googling the paper site, i.e. by e.g.
> "site:open-std.org std::any_view" and voila, P3411 pops up. Same for
> that other search.
>

The fact that it finds P1024R3 is insane. The paper doesn't even contain
"std::span::front" or "span::front" in text. I wonder if it's always this
good or if I just got lucky.