Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 10:26:50 +0100
On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 10:18, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:19 PM Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >
> > AI chatbots are a useless waste of time. When they don't hallucinate,
> > and their answers are not empty blabbering, you still don't trust their
> > answer and have to spend time to verify. About the same amount of time
> > that would take to find the original source anyway.
> >
> > What you want is a decent search engine.
>
>
> Dude you need to start living in the real world. It's absolutely
> mind-blowing some of the stuff that ChatGPT is coming out with lately
> . . . I've been flabbergasted at some of the output. I took my two
> favourite poems and fed them in, and asked it to mix them together
> into one poem, and it came back with pure beauty. Not just art though,
> it comes out with some impressive technical content. But of course,
> you need to double-check everything, because occasionally it comes out
> with nonsense (and people do too -- I've posted to this mailing list a
> few times and just a few seconds after clicking Send, I've realised
> that I was talking nonsense).
>
> But look, if we can make an AI website trained on every proposal
> paper, the people who hate AI can avoid it.
>
> Rather than turn this thread into "I love AI" versus "I hate AI" . . .
> Speaking to those people who would find such an AI website useful: How
> would I go about getting OpenAI to let us use their AI for this? Their
> AI is accessible at "chat.openai.com", so ideally we'd want something
> like "cxx.openai.com" which is automatically updated every 15 minutes
> with the latest proposal papers and posts from this mailing list. I
> suppose I could email them but I don't represent a company and I'm not
> a millionaire so I don't know if they'd take notice of me. I can try I
> suppose.
It already works though. ChatGPT can already answer your questions and
e.g. point to the 2024 paper on variadic friends.
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:19 PM Andrey Semashev wrote:
> >
> > AI chatbots are a useless waste of time. When they don't hallucinate,
> > and their answers are not empty blabbering, you still don't trust their
> > answer and have to spend time to verify. About the same amount of time
> > that would take to find the original source anyway.
> >
> > What you want is a decent search engine.
>
>
> Dude you need to start living in the real world. It's absolutely
> mind-blowing some of the stuff that ChatGPT is coming out with lately
> . . . I've been flabbergasted at some of the output. I took my two
> favourite poems and fed them in, and asked it to mix them together
> into one poem, and it came back with pure beauty. Not just art though,
> it comes out with some impressive technical content. But of course,
> you need to double-check everything, because occasionally it comes out
> with nonsense (and people do too -- I've posted to this mailing list a
> few times and just a few seconds after clicking Send, I've realised
> that I was talking nonsense).
>
> But look, if we can make an AI website trained on every proposal
> paper, the people who hate AI can avoid it.
>
> Rather than turn this thread into "I love AI" versus "I hate AI" . . .
> Speaking to those people who would find such an AI website useful: How
> would I go about getting OpenAI to let us use their AI for this? Their
> AI is accessible at "chat.openai.com", so ideally we'd want something
> like "cxx.openai.com" which is automatically updated every 15 minutes
> with the latest proposal papers and posts from this mailing list. I
> suppose I could email them but I don't represent a company and I'm not
> a millionaire so I don't know if they'd take notice of me. I can try I
> suppose.
It already works though. ChatGPT can already answer your questions and
e.g. point to the 2024 paper on variadic friends.
Received on 2025-05-09 09:27:07