Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 13:23:27 +0300
On May 9, 2025 12:18:38 PM Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:19 PM Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>
>> AI chatbots are a useless waste of time. When they don't hallucinate,
>> and their answers are not empty blabbering, you still don't trust their
>> answer and have to spend time to verify. About the same amount of time
>> that would take to find the original source anyway.
>>
>> What you want is a decent search engine.
>
>
> Dude you need to start living in the real world. It's absolutely
> mind-blowing some of the stuff that ChatGPT is coming out with lately
> . . . I've been flabbergasted at some of the output. I took my two
> favourite poems and fed them in, and asked it to mix them together
> into one poem, and it came back with pure beauty. Not just art though,
> it comes out with some impressive technical content.
Did the output have any substance to it or was it just beautifully rhymed
garbage?
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:19 PM Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>
>> AI chatbots are a useless waste of time. When they don't hallucinate,
>> and their answers are not empty blabbering, you still don't trust their
>> answer and have to spend time to verify. About the same amount of time
>> that would take to find the original source anyway.
>>
>> What you want is a decent search engine.
>
>
> Dude you need to start living in the real world. It's absolutely
> mind-blowing some of the stuff that ChatGPT is coming out with lately
> . . . I've been flabbergasted at some of the output. I took my two
> favourite poems and fed them in, and asked it to mix them together
> into one poem, and it came back with pure beauty. Not just art though,
> it comes out with some impressive technical content.
Did the output have any substance to it or was it just beautifully rhymed
garbage?
Received on 2025-05-09 10:23:31