Modules Ecosystem TR: Updated PR#4 with feedback from telecon
How to provide functionality as both header file and module?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module?
Meeting on Friday May 27th at 9AM Pacific
P2577R2: C++ Modules Discovery in Prebuilt Library Releases
Initial outline for modules-ecosystem-tr, plus terminology section
[D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key
- Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key
- Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key
- Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key
Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13
- Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13
- Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13
- Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13
Meeting on Friday May 13th at 9AM Pacific
unqualified-ids looked up by the compiler
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files)
- Re: Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files)
- Re: Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files)
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
- Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files
Re: Status
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?
- Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix?