C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13

From: Daniela Engert <dani_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 16:56:35 +0200
Am 13.05.2022 um 16:37 schrieb Daniel Ruoso via SG15:
> Em sex., 13 de mai. de 2022 às 10:31, Gabriel Dos Reis
> <gdr_at_[hidden]> escreveu:
>> Agreed, but what can this body (the study group) say more than "your
>> implementation needs to be unambiguous about what it considers
>> importable"?
> I think having a clear terminology is a starting point. But we'll
> definitely need to get into more details than that, including for
> things like "when you distribute a library, how do you tell what are
> the "importable" headers you ship.
>> Also, we don't import module units - we never do.
> I don't think I understand what you mean. Would you mind clarifying?

I'm pretty sure he wants to say that you import the BMI rather than the
module unit as the former is a compilation artefact of the latter.


PGP/GPG: 2CCB 3ECB 0954 5CD3 B0DB 6AA0 BA03 56A1 2C4638C5

Received on 2022-05-13 14:56:33