ISOCPP SG15 List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Ben Boeckel

Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key (2022-05-13 21:43:02)
Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key (2022-05-13 21:35:45)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 19:45:17)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 14:33:42)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 14:32:00)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 12:03:01)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-02 22:23:04)

ben.boeckel_at

[D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key (2022-05-13 20:37:13)

Bill Hoffman

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-06 22:36:27)

Boris Kolpackov

Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-17 13:58:29)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-17 11:09:27)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-12 03:44:09)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-12 03:19:59)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 14:18:13)

Brad King

Re: Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files) (2022-05-06 14:06:44)

Bret Brown

Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 16:17:29)

Daniel Ruoso

Modules Ecosystem TR: Updated PR#4 with feedback from telecon (2022-05-28 16:33:47)
Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 13:30:58)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 15:58:02)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 12:42:54)
P2577R2: C++ Modules Discovery in Prebuilt Library Releases (2022-05-17 22:01:02)
Initial outline for modules-ecosystem-tr, plus terminology section (2022-05-17 21:21:11)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-17 14:26:29)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-17 11:54:58)
Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key (2022-05-13 21:17:25)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 14:37:14)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 14:24:42)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 13:47:45)
Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-11 15:16:14)
Re: Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files) (2022-05-07 15:54:47)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-07 15:44:38)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-06 18:55:35)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-05 18:30:54)
Terminology for tooling (Was: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files) (2022-05-05 14:57:42)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 18:32:03)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 15:27:22)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 13:47:43)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 01:14:54)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 01:06:42)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 00:49:41)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 00:38:35)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 00:50:14)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-02 13:53:35)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-01 15:55:50)

Daniela Engert

Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 16:39:13)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 16:34:55)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-16 17:32:14)
Re: [D1689R5] Draft addition of the `is-interface` key (2022-05-14 05:32:43)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 14:56:35)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-11 16:29:32)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-05 07:47:19)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 14:22:50)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 11:45:11)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 11:26:32)

Gabriel Dos Reis

Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 14:49:57)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-17 12:32:02)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 15:07:24)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 14:31:15)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 14:19:02)
Re: Revisiting terminology, framing for meeting on 2022-05-13 (2022-05-13 13:23:24)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-09 19:44:20)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-09 17:43:20)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-09 17:39:20)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-05 18:53:43)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 17:27:03)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 17:22:08)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 17:16:56)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 12:11:18)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 11:59:51)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 11:33:40)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 11:30:32)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 01:11:00)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 01:02:27)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 00:44:25)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 22:47:32)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 19:34:05)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 19:33:22)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 19:30:32)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 12:48:24)

Iain Sandoe

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-06 19:41:32)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 12:00:17)

Jens Maurer

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 16:25:45)

Kirk Shoop

Re: [isocpp-ext] unqualified-ids looked up by the compiler (2022-05-06 22:55:05)

Michael Spencer

Re: Meeting on Friday May 27th at 9AM Pacific (2022-05-26 20:44:55)
Meeting on Friday May 27th at 9AM Pacific (2022-05-24 19:17:48)
Re: Initial outline for modules-ecosystem-tr, plus terminology section (2022-05-19 06:57:48)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-19 06:35:57)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-12 20:06:16)
Meeting on Friday May 13th at 9AM Pacific (2022-05-10 17:28:55)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-06 05:00:49)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-05 17:08:38)
Re: Status (2022-05-05 05:10:15)

Nathan Sidwell

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-09 19:33:48)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 10:46:03)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-03 13:02:04)

Nico Josuttis

Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 13:36:47)
Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 06:38:23)

Nicolai Josuttis

How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 05:19:03)
Re: [isocpp-core] [isocpp-ext] unqualified-ids looked up by the compiler (2022-05-07 07:18:40)

Stephen Kelly

Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 17:43:03)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 16:23:17)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 15:34:32)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-18 11:26:28)
Re: [isocpp-ext] Can we expect that all C++ source files can have the same suffix? (2022-05-16 11:53:28)

Steve Downey

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-04 15:30:32)

Timur Doumler

unqualified-ids looked up by the compiler (2022-05-06 19:23:13)

Tom Honermann

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-02 15:02:50)
Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files (2022-05-02 04:24:52)

许传奇(夜灯)

Re: [isocpp-ext] How to provide functionality as both header file and module? (2022-05-25 05:57:48)

Last message date: 2022-05-28 16:33:47