C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: P2581R0: Specifying the Interoperability of Binary Module Interface Files

From: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 18:25:45 +0200
On 04/05/2022 17.30, Steve Downey via SG15 wrote:
> If we can figure out a better set of names, or improve consistency, without changing the semantics of modules, the draft could be fixed editorially.

In theory, yes, but names are important and sticky, so I wouldn't
want to apply new names to the Working Draft without CWG and plenary

The scope here is a large-ish set of related names, likely needing
slightly involved fixes to the existing text. It would be good
if those changes could be presented in a coherent paper for

Jens (co-editor)

Received on 2022-05-04 16:26:01