Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:37:14 -0400
Em sex., 13 de mai. de 2022 às 10:31, Gabriel Dos Reis
<gdr_at_[hidden]> escreveu:
> Agreed, but what can this body (the study group) say more than "your
> implementation needs to be unambiguous about what it considers
> importable"?
I think having a clear terminology is a starting point. But we'll
definitely need to get into more details than that, including for
things like "when you distribute a library, how do you tell what are
the "importable" headers you ship.
> Also, we don't import module units - we never do.
I don't think I understand what you mean. Would you mind clarifying?
daniel
<gdr_at_[hidden]> escreveu:
> Agreed, but what can this body (the study group) say more than "your
> implementation needs to be unambiguous about what it considers
> importable"?
I think having a clear terminology is a starting point. But we'll
definitely need to get into more details than that, including for
things like "when you distribute a library, how do you tell what are
the "importable" headers you ship.
> Also, we don't import module units - we never do.
I don't think I understand what you mean. Would you mind clarifying?
daniel
Received on 2022-05-13 14:37:26