Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 18:29:32 +0200
Am 11.05.2022 um 17:16 schrieb Daniel Ruoso via SG15:
> Open question 1: Is it useful to differentiate non-modular units that
> import other modules (header or named) from the ones that don't? If
> so, what terms do we want to use?
From a tooling perspective - possibly. The former ones establish an
interface dependency whereas the latter ones don't. May be BMI-dependent
vs. independent?
> Open question 2: What do we call a "Module partition" which "does not
> contribute to the external interface"? We seem to have a contention
> between "Module Internal Partition Unit" and "Module Implementation
> Partition Unit".
"Internal" seems to the point, "implementation" covers only a subset of
its use cases.
Ciao
Dani
> Open question 1: Is it useful to differentiate non-modular units that
> import other modules (header or named) from the ones that don't? If
> so, what terms do we want to use?
From a tooling perspective - possibly. The former ones establish an
interface dependency whereas the latter ones don't. May be BMI-dependent
vs. independent?
> Open question 2: What do we call a "Module partition" which "does not
> contribute to the external interface"? We seem to have a contention
> between "Module Internal Partition Unit" and "Module Implementation
> Partition Unit".
"Internal" seems to the point, "implementation" covers only a subset of
its use cases.
Ciao
Dani
-- PGP/GPG: 2CCB 3ECB 0954 5CD3 B0DB 6AA0 BA03 56A1 2C4638C5
Received on 2022-05-11 16:29:33