ISOCPP std-proposals List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Thursday, 31 October 2019

Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Thiago Macieira
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Andrey Semashev
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Andrey Semashev
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Tae Lim Kook
Re: Allow reinterpret_cast (and static_cast from void*) in a constant expression in limited cases charlesmilette_at_[hidden]
Re: Allow reinterpret_cast (and static_cast from void*) in a constant expression in limited cases Brian Bi
Re: Allow reinterpret_cast (and static_cast from void*) in a constant expression in limited cases connor horman
Re: Allow reinterpret_cast (and static_cast from void*) in a constant expression in limited cases Arthur O'Dwyer
Allow reinterpret_cast (and static_cast from void*) in a constant expression in limited cases connor horman
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Andrey Semashev
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Andrey Semashev
Question about using _ for Pattern Matching Михаил Найденов
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Andrey Semashev
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally language.lawyer_at
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Miguel Ojeda
Re: Make class template parameters available externally connor horman
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Sebastian Büttner

Wednesday, 30 October 2019

Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Sebastian Büttner
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Bjorn Reese
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Ville Voutilainen
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Ville Voutilainen
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Ville Voutilainen
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Ville Voutilainen
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Brian Bi
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Ville Voutilainen
Re: Make class template parameters available externally Jake Arkinstall
Make class template parameters available externally Dmitry

Tuesday, 29 October 2019

Re: Beyond regex Justin Bassett
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Matthew Woehlke
Re: Beyond regex Justin Bassett
Re: Beyond regex Domen Vrankar
Re: Beyond regex Dejan Milosavljevic

Monday, 28 October 2019

Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Tom Honermann
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Thiago Macieira
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Thiago Macieira
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Beyond regex Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Tom Honermann

Sunday, 27 October 2019

Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Andrew Tomazos
Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Jorg Brown
Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Kosher Yosher
Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Magnus Fromreide
Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement connor horman

Saturday, 26 October 2019

Re: Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Justin Bassett
Beyond regex Dejan Milosavljevic
Initial Idea of Indirect If Statement Andrew Tomazos
Beyond regex Dejan Milosavljevic

Friday, 25 October 2019

Add std::basic_ios::setfail() setter function Tomek Rożen

Thursday, 24 October 2019

Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Lyberta
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Thiago Macieira
Re: Prevent Assignments from contextually converting to bool Tony V E
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Ville Voutilainen
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Arthur O'Dwyer
Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Tjernstrom, Staffan
Re: Prevent Assignments from contextually converting to bool Nicholl, Ryan
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Lyberta
Re: Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Tom Honermann
Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT Lyberta

Wednesday, 23 October 2019

Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Intars Dzalilovs
Re: New way to declare smart pointers Matthew Woehlke
Re: Prevent Assignments from contextually converting to bool Tjernstrom, Staffan
Re: Prevent Assignments from contextually converting to bool Brian Bi
Prevent Assignments from contextually converting to bool connor horman
Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Ville Voutilainen
Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Ville Voutilainen
Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: proposal: [[noexcept]] attribute Andrey Semashev
Re: New way to declare smart pointers Dmitry
Re: New way to declare smart pointers Domen Vrankar
proposal: [[noexcept]] attribute Walt Karas
New way to declare smart pointers Aymeric Pellé

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

Re: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Sophia Poirier
Beyond regex Dejan Milosavljevic
Re: FW: FW: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Dmitry
Guaranteeing more object contiguity Krystian Stasiowski

Sunday, 20 October 2019

Re: std::underlying_value Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: std::underlying_value Kosher Yosher
Re: std::underlying_value JeanHeyd Meneide
Re: std::underlying_value JeanHeyd Meneide
std::underlying_value Kosher Yosher

Friday, 18 October 2019

Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax John
Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax John
if !consteval Victor Dyachenko

Thursday, 17 October 2019

Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax Matthew Woehlke
Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax Tae Lim Kook
Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax Jake Arkinstall
Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax John McFarlane

Wednesday, 16 October 2019

Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: P0593R5 Implicit creation of objects ...: About reinterpret_cast in examples Kazutoshi Satoda
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Jake Arkinstall
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Andrey Semashev
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Andrey Semashev
Re: Improved Member Operator Syntax Andrew Tomazos
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Improved Member Operator Syntax John

Tuesday, 15 October 2019

Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Tony V E
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Miguel Ojeda
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Andrey Semashev
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Matthew Woehlke
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Andrey Semashev
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Tony V E
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Tony V E
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Tony V E
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Tony V E
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Jake Arkinstall
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Thiago Macieira
Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta

Monday, 14 October 2019

Re: Reserve good keywords for floating point types Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Low-hanging fruit: virtual plain-old-data members Brian Bi
Low-hanging fruit: virtual plain-old-data members denis bider
Re: P0593R5 Implicit creation of objects ...: About reinterpret_cast in examples Kazutoshi Satoda

Sunday, 13 October 2019

Reserve good keywords for floating point types Lyberta

Saturday, 5 October 2019

Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: FW: FW: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Template qualifiers Brian Bi
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
FW: FW: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. sotrdg sotrdg
Re: The C++ 17&&20 object model is broken, and concepts would reveal it for the world to see Arthur O'Dwyer

Friday, 4 October 2019

The C++ 17&&20 object model is broken, and concepts would reveal it for the world to see Omer Rosler
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Brian Bi
Re: Template qualifiers Jake Arkinstall
Re: Template qualifiers Andrey Semashev
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard

Thursday, 3 October 2019

Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: FW: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: Template qualifiers Matthew Woehlke
Re: Template qualifiers Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: std::duplicate Michael Daum
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: std::duplicate Tam S. B.
Re: std::duplicate Coobeeyon
Re: std::duplicate Michael Spencer

Wednesday, 2 October 2019

Re: std::duplicate Lyberta
Re: std::duplicate Michael Daum
Re: std::duplicate Tony V E
Re: std::duplicate Michael Daum
Re: std::duplicate Gašper Ažman
Re: std::duplicate Michael Daum
Re: std::duplicate Gašper Ažman
std::duplicate Michael Daum
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Ville Voutilainen
Re: Template qualifiers Barry Revzin
Re: Template qualifiers Mingxin Wang
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Mingxin Wang
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: Template qualifiers Mingxin Wang

Tuesday, 1 October 2019

FW: Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. sotrdg sotrdg
Reply to Herb Sutter about Zero-Overhead deterministic. It is not true. sotrdg sotrdg
Re: Template qualifiers Phil Bouchard
Re: [RFC] String_view support for regex Arthur O'Dwyer

Last message date: 2019-10-31 21:45:19