C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Restrict possible values of CHAR_BIT
From: Thiago Macieira (thiago_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-28 12:09:42


On Monday, 28 October 2019 09:10:14 PDT Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals
wrote:
> Obviously, atomic_uint8_t, atomic_char, atomic_uchar, atomic_char8_t would
> not exist.

Never mind the last. They can be emulated with a lock. Maybe an RMW on the
larger word works too, I don't know if that introduces ABA problems.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel System Software Products

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups