C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Reserve good keywords for floating point types
From: Thiago Macieira (thiago_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-16 02:20:51


On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 00:17:28 PDT Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals
wrote:
> (u)int_leastN_t types are good for guaranteeing the lowest size, but
> they don't they don't offer much compared to (u)intN_t. Given that
> (u)intN_t are universally available, people don't see the point in using
> them.

According to the standard (u)intN_t aren't universally required, but
uint_leastN_t are.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel System Software Products

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups