Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:17:27 -0700
On Thursday, 31 October 2019 00:57:40 PDT language.lawyer--- via Std-Proposals
wrote:
> I think your vector example is a bit unfortunate.
> STDlib implementers would still have to use reserved identifiers as template
> parameter names.
No, they wouldn't. If the parameter names were automatically injected *and*
they are required by the standard to appear as typedefs in the class's
context, then those names can't be macros defined by the user in the first
place.
wrote:
> I think your vector example is a bit unfortunate.
> STDlib implementers would still have to use reserved identifiers as template
> parameter names.
No, they wouldn't. If the parameter names were automatically injected *and*
they are required by the standard to appear as typedefs in the class's
context, then those names can't be macros defined by the user in the first
place.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
Received on 2019-10-31 15:19:50