Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Reserve good keywords for floating point types
From: Thiago Macieira (thiago_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-16 17:53:22
On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 00:26:44 PDT Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals
> On 2019-10-16 10:20, Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 00:17:28 PDT Andrey Semashev via
> > Std-Proposals>
> > wrote:
> >> (u)int_leastN_t types are good for guaranteeing the lowest size, but
> >> they don't they don't offer much compared to (u)intN_t. Given that
> >> (u)intN_t are universally available, people don't see the point in using
> >> them.
> > According to the standard (u)intN_t aren't universally required, but
> > uint_leastN_t are.
> Yes, but in practice they are universally available. As are (u)intptr_t.
In practice, int is 32-bit.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
STD-PROPOSALS list run by email@example.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups