Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Reserve good keywords for floating point types
From: Matthew Woehlke (mwoehlke.floss_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-15 13:40:33
On 15/10/2019 07.23, Lyberta via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Any useful program is connected to the Internet.
So, no "useful" programs were written prior to 1990? That's news to me...
> Maybe by proxy i.e. its data is sent over by another program. Knowing
> exact binary layout is crucial.
No. I can, and should, take care of binary layout at the point I need to
[de]serialize data that is going to exist elsewhere, whether that is on
disk, or across a network. However, for internal operation, I just need
some representation that is "good enough". (See also Jake's reply.)
> Again, flexible types are a relic of the past and only useful in
> extremely rare circumstances. Fixed layout is what's needed in 99% of cases.
I think every programmer that deals with embedded systems is liable to
disagree with you.
Moreover, I can trivially give a counterexample: the existence of
int_leastN_t, int_fastN_t, etc.
STD-PROPOSALS list run by email@example.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups