Wednesday, 30 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Make std::bitset a C++20 range?
- Re: [std-proposals] Make std::bitset a C++20 range?
- [std-proposals] Make std::bitset a C++20 range?
Tuesday, 29 August 2023
Monday, 28 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Unary dereference/addressof as function objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
Sunday, 27 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft Proposal for elaborate extension points
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- [std-proposals] Draft Proposal for elaborate extension points
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
Saturday, 26 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
Friday, 25 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- [std-proposals] Add [[no_unique_address]] attribute to std::pair
- Re: [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
- [std-proposals] Every variable is volatile, everything is laundered, no optimisation
Thursday, 24 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Contracts: Observe semantic and multiple preconditions
- [std-proposals] Contracts: Observe semantic and multiple preconditions
- [std-proposals] Unary dereference/addressof as function objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Utilizing constant folding with provable if statements
- Re: [std-proposals] Utilizing constant folding with provable if statements
- [std-proposals] Utilizing constant folding with provable if statements
Wednesday, 23 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
Wednesday, 23 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
Wednesday, 23 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
Tuesday, 22 August 2023
Monday, 21 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
- [std-proposals] Copy-construct, move-construct, and PR-construct
Saturday, 19 August 2023
Friday, 18 August 2023
Thursday, 17 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
Wednesday, 16 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- [std-proposals] Only reason I don't use std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
Tuesday, 15 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- [std-proposals] Detection of whether a determined user-defined literal is declared
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
Monday, 14 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- [std-proposals] C++ never had a compiler without a stack
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- [std-proposals] Preprocessor
Sunday, 13 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] throw = runtime_error;
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] throw = runtime_error;
- Re: [std-proposals] throw = runtime_error;
- [std-proposals] throw = runtime_error;
- Re: [std-proposals] Searching the Mailing List Archive
- Re: [std-proposals] Searching the Mailing List Archive
Saturday, 12 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Searching the Mailing List Archive
- [std-proposals] Searching the Mailing List Archive
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Where standard library for working with packs?
- Re: [std-proposals] Where standard library for working with packs?
- Re: [std-proposals] Where standard library for working with packs?
- [std-proposals] Where standard library for working with packs?
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
Friday, 11 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
Thursday, 10 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
Wednesday, 9 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Revision 1 of scoped enum enhancements (Answer to Sebastian Wittmeier)
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- [std-proposals] Coroutines: Add explicit initialization by "co_init" operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Revision 1 of scoped enum enhancements (Answer to Sebastian Wittmeier)
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
Tuesday, 8 August 2023
Friday, 4 August 2023
Thursday, 3 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
- [std-proposals] Concurrent containers
Tuesday, 1 August 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- Re: [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- Re: [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- Re: [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- Re: [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake
- [std-proposals] Header Units Problem and Possible Fixes In HMake