Monday, 31 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- Re: [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- [std-proposals] std::type_info::size()
- Re: [std-proposals] Revision 1 of scoped enum enhancements
Sunday, 30 July 2023
Friday, 28 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Add std::shift_left and std::shift_right as function objects
- [std-proposals] Add std::shift_left and std::shift_right as function objects
Thursday, 27 July 2023
Wednesday, 26 July 2023
Tuesday, 25 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
Monday, 24 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- Re: [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
- [std-proposals] Functions that don't need parentheses to make a call
Sunday, 23 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
Saturday, 22 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- [std-proposals] Require diagnostic for array to bool conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
Friday, 21 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- Re: [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- [std-proposals] Appending a string to itself
- [std-proposals] Literal representing for chrono::days/weeks/months/years
Thursday, 20 July 2023
Tuesday, 18 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] Template Type Resolution -- Special Rules for std::function
- Re: [std-proposals] Template Type Resolution -- Special Rules for std::function
- Re: [std-proposals] Template Type Resolution -- Special Rules for std::function
- [std-proposals] Template Type Resolution -- Special Rules for std::function
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
Monday, 17 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. Destructors.
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
Sunday, 16 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 57
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
Saturday, 15 July 2023
- [std-proposals] Return Value Optimisation whenever you need it (guaranteed elision)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] std::dummy_prvalue -- Kind of, sort of, like a std::declval that you can evaluate
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] std::dummy_prvalue -- Kind of, sort of, like a std::declval that you can evaluate
- Re: [std-proposals] std::dummy_prvalue -- Kind of, sort of, like a std::declval that you can evaluate
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. Destructors.
- Re: [std-proposals] std::dummy_prvalue -- Kind of, sort of, like a std::declval that you can evaluate
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. POSIX threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow automatically deduced return type for explicitly defaulted move- and copy-assignment operators
- [std-proposals] std::dummy_prvalue -- Kind of, sort of, like a std::declval that you can evaluate
Friday, 14 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. Do you have a working implementation?
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads. Do you have a working implementation?
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads.
- [std-proposals] Forced stopping of RAII compliant execution threads.
Thursday, 13 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow automatically deduced return type for explicitly defaulted move- and copy-assignment operators
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow automatically deduced return type for explicitly defaulted move- and copy-assignment operators
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- [std-proposals] Allow automatically deduced return type for explicitly defaulted move- and copy-assignment operators
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
Wednesday, 12 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- Re: [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
- [std-proposals] "shared libraries are outside the scope of the C++ standard"
Tuesday, 11 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- [std-proposals] Prevent re-entry but re-queue the event
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- [std-proposals] Impact of defaulted ctor on value initialization
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
Monday, 10 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- [std-proposals] Fwd: std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- Re: [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
- [std-proposals] std::enum_max and std::enum_min
Sunday, 9 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] std::jthread - Invoke member function pointer with stop_token
- Re: [std-proposals] std::jthread - Invoke member function pointer with stop_token
- [std-proposals] std::jthread - Invoke member function pointer with stop_token
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for including std::reduction_map and std::reduction_multimap in the C++23 Standard
Saturday, 8 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
Friday, 7 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
- Re: [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- [std-proposals] A Standardized Package Descriptor Table for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for an Extended Memory Management (EMM) Library for the C++Standard
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for an Extended Memory Management (EMM) Library for the C++Standard
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
- [std-proposals] Proposal for an Extended Memory Management (EMM) Library for the C++Standard
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
- [std-proposals] Proposal to introduce a Hardware Security Namespace to the C++ Standard Library.
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for 'std::fiber<T>' Language-level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] [Forward: std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- [std-proposals] [Forward: std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
- [std-proposals] Proposal for `std::fiber<T>` Language-Level Extension in C++23
Thursday, 6 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] C++23.Standards.Committee.Propasal.For.Validated.Types.h
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] C++23.Standards.Committee.Propasal.For.Validated.Types.h
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- Re: [std-proposals] C++23.Standards.Committee.Propasal.For.Validated.Types.h
- Re: [std-proposals] Is that a compiler bug or unspecified behavior?
- [std-proposals] Is that a compiler bug or unspecified behavior?
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- [std-proposals] span<incomplete_type>
- [std-proposals] C++23.Standards.Committee.Propasal.For.Validated.Types.h
- Re: [std-proposals] [External Email] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 17
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 19
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 19
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] [External Email] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 17
- Re: [std-proposals] [External Email] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 17
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 15
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 15
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 52, Issue 14
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Request for a Standard LaTeX Template for Proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Request for a Standard LaTeX Template for Proposals
- [std-proposals] Request for a Standard LaTeX Template for Proposals
Wednesday, 5 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for Uniform Forward And Move
- [std-proposals] Efficient and silent bounds checking with silent_at()
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for Uniform Forward And Move
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
Tuesday, 4 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Use optional<T> as though it were T
- Re: [std-proposals] Member apply
Monday, 3 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Member apply
- Re: [std-proposals] Issues submiting a proposal
- [std-proposals] Issues submiting a proposal
- Re: [std-proposals] Member apply
- Re: [std-proposals] Member apply
- Re: [std-proposals] Member apply
- [std-proposals] Member apply
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
Sunday, 2 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
Saturday, 1 July 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] New function attribute [[nodiscard_scope]]
- [std-proposals] std::contains_mutable
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] New function attribute [[nodiscard_scope]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array
- [std-proposals] Mandate layout of std::array