There is a reason, why current language models are frowned upon, when the users just rely on them instead of understanding _and_ checking the subject topics.   They are forbidden on stackoverflow.com (https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-generative-ai-e-g-chatgpt-is-banned), lawyers could get sanctioned for not checking their submissals (https://lsj.com.au/articles/lawyer-faces-sanctions-for-using-bogus-citations-from-chatgpt/), etc.   If you do not even invest the time to check the answers on this mailing list and the link references yourself, you are wasting everyone's else's time. So please, even if you let yourself help by ChatGPT, you have to read, understand and improve upon the topics, you are providing proposals for, in depth! Perhaps you think, you are smart, just using those tools, when actually it is kind of fake, if you do not use a disclaimer in your messages and in your proposal that it actually has not been fully written by yourself.       -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:1one1 via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> Gesendet:Fr 07.07.2023 15:51 Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for ‘std::fiber<T>‘ Language-level Extension in C++23 An:Jonathan Wakely via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>; Bjorn Reese <breese_at_[hidden]>; CC:1one1 <ahshabazz_at_[hidden]>; Thanks for the URL Bjorn. I will supply the link to my OpenAI GPT Model to further help me hone the key concepts of my proposal. If there are any mistakes in this proposal which need correcting, they are my own!  And the very gifted people on this standards committee need to stop denigrating other members whom use these large language models to better clarify their ideas; It's like Einstein bullying the kid in the back of the class room because he uses a calculator, admonishing him to properly attribute his to Casio or Texas Instruments...  Regards, Abdul S.   -- Std-Proposals mailing list Std-Proposals_at_[hidden] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals