Tuesday, 27 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] [ ] Mixed Wide String Literal Concatenation for C
- [SG16] [ ] Mixed Wide String Literal Concatenation for C
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2020-10-28
Sunday, 25 October 2020
Thursday, 22 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Invitation: ISO C++ SG16 (Unicode) Telecon
- [SG16] Invitation: ISO C++ SG16 (Unicode) Telecon
Wednesday, 21 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
Monday, 19 October 2020
Sunday, 18 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
Saturday, 17 October 2020
Friday, 16 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
Thursday, 15 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-lib-ext] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
- [SG16] D1030R4 draft 2: std::filesystem::path_view
Wednesday, 14 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
- Re: [SG16] Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
Tuesday, 13 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- [SG16] Colleague at work interested in SG16 work
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow, Wednesday, 2020-10-14
Monday, 12 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
Saturday, 10 October 2020
- Re: [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
- [SG16] Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature