Subject: Re: Proposed normative wording for P1030 path_view draft 1
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-10-16 03:49:46
On 15/10/2020 23:24, Tom Honermann wrote:
>> Please do seek the volunteer however, and I'll get them draft 2 by
>> next week. The biggest change in R4 relevant to SG16 is configurable
>> separator interpretation, where we shall need to take a decision about
>> how it needs to interact with Unicode normalisation and separator
>> collapsing. Earlier editions did not have it at all, LEWG (via a
>> comment from Billy actually) added it in Prague.
> Steve Downey bravely stepped forward to offer his services.
Many thanks Steve! Draft 3 is already in production incorporating the
surprising amounts of feedback from the reflector to draft 2. Should be
SG16 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org