Send it to me when you have something to review. It will be a refreshing
change from c++ identifier Unicode syntax.

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020, 18:24 Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On 10/14/20 5:32 AM, Niall Douglas via SG16 wrote:
> > On 14/10/2020 06:33, Tom Honermann wrote:
> >> Thank you, Nial. I'll ask for a volunteer at the SG16 telecon
> >> scheduled for this week (in under 24 hours) to perform a review.
> >> Unless that review raises new SG16 specific concerns, I'm not
> >> inclined to spend further SG16 telecon time on this paper as I think
> >> LEWG is well positioned to take it from here. LEWG and/or LWG can
> >> always request specific input from SG16 if their respective chairs
> >> feel doing so is warranted.
> >
> > Billy gave extensive, highly transforming, "only an implementer would
> > see this stuff" feedback which widely transforms the paper. Basically
> > it has to be rewritten, and I'm about half done in that rewrite. I've
> > also merged feedback from Corentin, and I think a better proposed
> > wording has resulted.
> >
> > The reference implementation in LLFIO has been upgraded to match the
> > future wording, and source compatibility breakage has not been terrible.
> >
> > Please do seek the volunteer however, and I'll get them draft 2 by
> > next week. The biggest change in R4 relevant to SG16 is configurable
> > separator interpretation, where we shall need to take a decision about
> > how it needs to interact with Unicode normalisation and separator
> > collapsing. Earlier editions did not have it at all, LEWG (via a
> > comment from Billy actually) added it in Prague.
>
> Steve Downey bravely stepped forward to offer his services.
>
> Tom.
>
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Niall
>
>
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>