ISOCPP sg12 List: by thread

[ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-26 16:00:40)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-08-26 16:12:15)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 16:27:58)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Chris Jefferson (2013-08-26 16:33:12)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Chandler Carruth (2013-08-26 16:57:48)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 18:12:01)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-26 18:26:56)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 18:38:46)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 06:21:20)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jens Maurer (2013-10-10 06:43:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 07:36:18)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-10 14:31:09)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 20:33:38)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 20:39:37)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 21:32:41)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 21:43:39)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-10 21:58:58)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 22:04:21)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-26 16:31:39)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? John Spicer (2013-08-26 17:02:31)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 18:17:20)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? John Spicer (2013-08-26 18:26:55)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 19:07:51)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-26 18:33:16)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-26 18:43:07)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-08-26 18:52:23)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-08-26 18:58:51)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-08-26 19:02:46)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Daniel Krügler (2013-08-26 19:01:32)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-08-26 19:04:00)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Xavier Leroy (2013-08-27 08:00:27)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-27 15:48:50)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-27 16:49:16)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Xavier Leroy (2013-08-27 17:28:45)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-27 17:39:57)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-27 17:51:58)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-27 18:20:09)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? John Spicer (2013-08-27 18:37:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Richard Smith (2013-08-27 18:59:07)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-27 19:18:48)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Daniel Krügler (2013-08-27 19:23:16)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-08-27 19:54:44)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-10 23:08:38)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 23:24:09)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-11 01:18:18)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:37:30)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-15 22:39:01)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-15 23:10:09)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 14:54:02)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:06:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:31:11)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:37:12)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:40:45)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:50:59)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:57:34)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:32:09)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:28:12)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:23:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:43:43)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:51:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 22:03:37)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-16 22:13:52)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-17 05:27:36)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Peter Sommerlad (2013-10-17 08:38:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-17 14:42:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:17:01)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:19:09)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett (2013-10-17 19:38:05)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 19:41:18)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-17 19:51:54)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett (2013-10-17 20:07:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 23:12:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:16:02)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 23:28:06)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 00:18:13)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 02:30:20)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 04:06:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:17:25)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:13:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 04:30:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 05:24:40)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 05:15:27)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 05:53:15)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:06:08)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Roger Orr (2013-10-19 11:58:44)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:37:22)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:14:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 22:56:25)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:10:39)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Stephan T. Lavavej (2013-10-16 22:27:32)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 15:10:22)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 15:43:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 16:03:42)
        
        [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 16:14:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-18 16:26:25)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 16:41:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-18 16:52:08)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Stephan T. Lavavej (2013-10-18 19:05:41)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Matt Austern (2013-10-18 19:54:38)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:22:30)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits John Spicer (2013-10-18 20:32:21)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-19 03:19:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-19 06:37:03)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-19 07:03:47)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter (2013-10-19 21:37:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-20 11:18:10)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter (2013-10-21 16:22:38)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14564] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-19 08:02:14)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:37:09)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-19 03:15:57)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jason Merrill (2013-10-20 03:51:06)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-24 22:40:47)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 22:50:30)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-24 23:01:55)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:15:05)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Aaron Ballman (2013-10-24 23:22:32)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14587] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at (2013-10-24 23:23:09)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-24 23:38:54)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14593] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at (2013-10-25 00:07:21)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-26 20:31:44)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-26 20:51:11)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-26 21:50:13)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 13:37:30)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 00:07:13)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-28 21:19:59)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-27 08:06:51)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-27 16:08:26)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 17:08:48)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-27 17:12:53)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 17:17:20)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-27 22:46:35)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-27 23:52:01)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 01:32:24)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-28 17:07:24)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-30 21:25:05)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2018-11-24 11:59:16)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-28 21:43:39)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-30 21:48:57)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 13:28:23)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-20 10:05:23)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-20 17:36:39)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-21 11:49:32)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 04:35:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-24 08:06:53)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:01:30)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:41:46)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 06:33:57)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14579] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 07:14:30)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 07:25:06)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 09:02:38)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 22:46:13)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:10:29)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-25 18:44:41)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Martin Sebor (2013-10-18 16:47:23)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:15:44)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-18 16:29:22)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-18 17:00:10)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:20:19)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:11:14)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-15 23:14:29)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:15:19)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:27:45)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:38:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:46:33)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-16 15:50:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:53:34)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:55:32)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-16 15:58:41)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:15:43)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:25:19)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:43:19)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:22:54)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 16:04:26)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:29:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Howard Hinnant (2013-10-18 17:28:53)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 18:19:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jason Merrill (2013-10-16 21:49:03)
    - [ub] set keys and ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:44:05)
    - [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:57:33)
      - Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-18 06:46:42)
        
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 07:07:44)
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 17:12:58)
        
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 17:21:37)
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 17:22:56)

Last message date: 2013-08-27 19:54:44