C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers?

From: Nevin Liber <nevin_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 13:58:51 -0500
On 26 August 2013 13:52, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> I have strong reasons to believe we'll see an NB comment proposing
> std::less
> to be specialized for tuple<T*> and containers.

What about tuple<T*&>? I'm thinking about what is returned from std::tie,
as one quick way to implement a comparison operator for a user defined type
is to compare the result of std::tie called on the appropriate member
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404

Received on 2013-08-26 20:59:33