C++ Logo

SG12

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-26 13:58:51


On 26 August 2013 13:52, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>wrote:

>
> I have strong reasons to believe we'll see an NB comment proposing
> std::less
> to be specialized for tuple<T*> and containers.
>

What about tuple<T*&>? I'm thinking about what is returned from std::tie,
as one quick way to implement a comparison operator for a user defined type
is to compare the result of std::tie called on the appropriate member
variables.

-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404



SG12 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com