ISOCPP sg16 List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Wednesday, 1 December 2021

[SG16] Proposed resolution for LWG3639: Handling of fill character width is underspecified in std::format Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 30 November 2021

[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for November 17th, 2021 Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
[SG16] New version of P1854 and P2361 in the mailing Corentin

Monday, 29 November 2021

Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report Peter Brett
[SG16] ISO10646 defect report Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 Corentin Jabot
[SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 Cleiton Santoia

Sunday, 28 November 2021

Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon Corentin Jabot
[SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann

Saturday, 27 November 2021

Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) Steve Downey

Friday, 26 November 2021

Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) Inbal Levi
Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) Tom Honermann
[SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) Inbal Levi

Tuesday, 23 November 2021

Re: [SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings Corentin

Thursday, 18 November 2021

Re: [SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings Peter Brett

Wednesday, 17 November 2021

[SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings Corentin
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Peter Brett
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Corentin Jabot
[SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 16 November 2021

Re: [SG16] ICU encoding name alias conflicts Steven R. Loomis
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
[SG16] ICU encoding name alias conflicts Tom Honermann

Monday, 15 November 2021

[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for November 3rd, 2021 Tom Honermann

Sunday, 14 November 2021

[SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann

Monday, 8 November 2021

Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Corentin

Sunday, 7 November 2021

Saturday, 6 November 2021

Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Corentin Jabot
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Corentin
[SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Hubert Tong
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning Hubert Tong

Wednesday, 3 November 2021

Re: [SG16] Comments on P2361R3 Unevaluated strings Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-03 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Draft d2071 Jens Maurer
[SG16] Draft d2071 Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Tom Honermann
[SG16] Comments on P2361R3 Unevaluated strings Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-03 SG16 telecon Tom Honermann
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Jens Maurer
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Steve Downey
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences JF Bastien
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences Steve Downey

Monday, 1 November 2021

[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for October 20th, 2021 Tom Honermann

Last message date: 2021-12-01 05:02:56