Is the time actually correct?
It is not reflected on the agenda

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 4:22 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, November 17th at 19:30 UTC (timezone
> conversion
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20211117T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet>
> ).
>
>
> *For participants in North America, please note that daylight savings time
> ended 2021-11-07, so this telecon will start one hour earlier than our last
> telecon (European time zones changed prior to our last meeting). Consult
> the timezone link above to resolve any uncertainty. *
>
> The agenda is:
>
> - P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of
> meaning <https://wg21.link/p1854r1>
> - New revision review.
> - P2361R3: Unevaluated strings <https://wg21.link/p2361r3>
> - New revision review; we last reviewed this proposal during the 2021-09-22
> telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-22nd-2021>.
>
> We last reviewed P1854 in Belfast. Please review the minutes recorded here
> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1854R0> as well as recent
> email discussion archived here
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2780.php> (with additional
> discussion since our last telecon starting here
> <https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/11/2809.php>). Prior polls on this
> proposal are located with the minutes for P1885 here
> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1885R0>. We had
> previously decided to block P1854 on P1855 (as noted in those polls). Now
> that we have forwarded P1885, P1854 is cleared to proceed.
>
> We last reviewed P2361 during our 2021-09-22 telecon
> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#september-22nd-2021>.
> Please review those notes as well as the new revision.
>
> Tom.
> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>