Hi Corentin,

The meeting will be at 19:30 UTC.

If it’s not, I won’t be attending or chairing it.

                       Peter

From: SG16 <sg16-bounces_at_lists.isocpp.org> On Behalf Of Corentin Jabot via SG16
Sent: 17 November 2021 18:20
To: SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Corentin Jabot <corentinjabot_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon

EXTERNAL MAIL
Is the time actually correct?
It is not reflected on the agenda

On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 4:22 AM Tom Honermann via SG16 <sg16_at_[hidden]<mailto:sg16_at_[hidden]>> wrote:

SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, November 17th at 19:30 UTC (timezone conversion<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20211117T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pst&p3=tz_mst&p4=tz_cst&p5=tz_est&p6=tz_cet__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlKJ7mZTFA$>).

For participants in North America, please note that daylight savings time ended 2021-11-07, so this telecon will start one hour earlier than our last telecon (European time zones changed prior to our last meeting). Consult the timezone link above to resolve any uncertainty.

The agenda is:

  * P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wg21.link/p1854r1__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlLxsSNfKQ$>

     * New revision review.

  * P2361R3: Unevaluated strings<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wg21.link/p2361r3__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlJjjHhaXA$>

     * New revision review; we last reviewed this proposal during the 2021-09-22 telecon<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings*september-22nd-2021__;Iw!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlK1p89vrA$>.

We last reviewed P1854 in Belfast. Please review the minutes recorded here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1854R0__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlKIf-mm-w$> as well as recent email discussion archived here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/10/2780.php__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlJILWHw_A$> (with additional discussion since our last telecon starting here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2021/11/2809.php__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlJ8PYanEg$>). Prior polls on this proposal are located with the minutes for P1885 here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1885R0__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlJdHFQ_wg$>. We had previously decided to block P1854 on P1855 (as noted in those polls). Now that we have forwarded P1885, P1854 is cleared to proceed.

We last reviewed P2361 during our 2021-09-22 telecon<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings*september-22nd-2021__;Iw!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlK1p89vrA$>. Please review those notes as well as the new revision.

Tom.
--
SG16 mailing list
SG16_at_[hidden]<mailto:SG16_at_[hidden]>
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16__;!!EHscmS1ygiU1lA!QYrUXHYq--7Ro806qoRNboQ9PWdFuiv0HLiWyYihEteKMDFHsRQdNlIOH9Tfng$>