ISOCPP sg16 List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Cleiton Santoia

[SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 (2021-11-29 02:16:33)

Corentin

[SG16] New version of P1854 and P2361 in the mailing (2021-11-30 08:54:43)
Re: [SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings (2021-11-23 10:34:44)
[SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings (2021-11-17 21:36:27)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-08 17:05:29)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-07 15:58:43)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-07 13:59:29)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 08:17:13)

Corentin Jabot

Re: [SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 (2021-11-29 07:44:51)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon (2021-11-28 09:42:54)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning (2021-11-17 19:12:24)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning (2021-11-17 18:34:39)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-17 18:19:43)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 08:46:30)

Hubert Tong

Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-07 17:30:50)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-07 15:24:53)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 22:21:16)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 15:22:05)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 03:05:37)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 02:05:07)

Inbal Levi

Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) (2021-11-26 21:50:22)
[SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) (2021-11-26 17:04:09)

Jens Maurer

Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 13:18:48)
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 12:47:32)
Re: [SG16] SI unities with unicode identifiers according to p1949 (2021-11-29 08:16:18)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon (2021-11-28 10:22:31)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning (2021-11-17 19:02:40)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-07 13:55:39)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-07 08:03:36)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning (2021-11-06 20:07:57)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 20:02:33)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 13:00:57)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 12:03:43)
Re: [SG16] Comments on P2361R3 Unevaluated strings (2021-11-03 21:56:35)
Re: [SG16] Draft d2071 (2021-11-03 19:33:34)
[SG16] Comments on P2361R3 Unevaluated strings (2021-11-03 18:29:04)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 18:07:21)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 08:21:12)

JF Bastien

Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 06:03:40)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 02:46:01)

Peter Brett

Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 13:55:29)
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 13:07:45)
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 12:59:50)
Re: [SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 11:23:48)
[SG16] ISO10646 defect report (2021-11-29 10:55:07)
Re: [SG16] P2361R4 - Unevaluated Strings (2021-11-18 13:39:13)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-17 18:21:32)

Steve Downey

Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) (2021-11-27 23:04:29)
Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 22:56:58)
[SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective) (2021-11-06 04:24:47)
[SG16] Draft d2071 (2021-11-03 19:28:28)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 12:03:24)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 02:58:34)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 02:07:03)

Steven R. Loomis

Re: [SG16] ICU encoding name alias conflicts (2021-11-16 22:33:33)

Tom Honermann

[SG16] Proposed resolution for LWG3639: Handling of fill character width is underspecified in std::format (2021-12-01 05:02:56)
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for November 17th, 2021 (2021-11-30 19:41:12)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon (2021-11-30 18:13:19)
[SG16] Agenda for the 2021-12-01 SG16 telecon (2021-11-28 00:30:56)
Re: [SG16] Please review "P2286R3: Formatting Ranges" (by Barry Revzin) (2021-11-26 20:34:26)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-17 19:30:11)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-17 19:17:57)
Re: [SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning (2021-11-17 19:11:48)
[SG16] Feedback on P1854R1: Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of, meaning (2021-11-17 17:40:45)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-16 19:17:59)
[SG16] ICU encoding name alias conflicts (2021-11-16 00:20:14)
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for November 3rd, 2021 (2021-11-15 21:40:08)
[SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-17 SG16 telecon (2021-11-14 03:22:04)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-03 SG16 telecon (2021-11-03 19:44:53)
Re: [SG16] Draft Named Escape Sequences (2021-11-03 19:14:50)
Re: [SG16] Agenda for the 2021-11-03 SG16 telecon (2021-11-03 17:30:12)
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for October 20th, 2021 (2021-11-01 18:39:28)

Last message date: 2021-12-01 05:02:56