Wow, past me was way more on top of things than current me! Carry on 😅

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:58 AM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I believe it was pencilled in for the 10th for EWG?
>
> <Quote>
> Got it, you're on for 2021-11-10.
> Hide quoted text
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:26 AM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> 11/10 would be slightly better for me, as 10/27 is during CppCon.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:26 AM JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Ok. Steve let me know what works best for you.
>
> </Quote>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 22:46 JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Is the intent to get this into C++20? We don't have many slots left to
>> see it if so.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:07 AM Steve Downey via SG16 <
>> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Updated paper with wording for UCN form of named unicode characters,
>>> with changes as suggested by Jens. This reflects the strongest consensus in
>>> EWG for exact matches.
>>>
>>> This doesn't mention the latest CVE, Trojan Source, which might have
>>> mitigations using named UCNs, where it would be much more obvious what
>>> shenanigans were being played with RTL modifications. I will be prepared to
>>> talk about that, briefly.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 3:29 PM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll have it sent out soon. Technical problems during CppCon put me
>>>> behind schedule a bit.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021, 12:43 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, Steve. Do you expect to have an updated revision of P2071
>>>>> available for this week's SG16 telecon? If so, please attach or provide a
>>>>> link in a reply once it is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tom.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/20/21 3:38 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Draft d2071r1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>> SG16 mailing list
>>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>>
>>