I believe it was pencilled in for the 10th for EWG?

<Quote>
Got it, you're on for 2021-11-10.
Hide quoted text

On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 8:26 AM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:

11/10 would be slightly better for me, as 10/27 is during CppCon.

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:26 AM JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:

Ok. Steve let me know what works best for you.

</Quote>


On Tue, Nov 2, 2021, 22:46 JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Is the intent to get this into C++20? We don't have many slots left to see
> it if so.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:07 AM Steve Downey via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Updated paper with wording for UCN form of named unicode characters, with
>> changes as suggested by Jens. This reflects the strongest consensus in EWG
>> for exact matches.
>>
>> This doesn't mention the latest CVE, Trojan Source, which might have
>> mitigations using named UCNs, where it would be much more obvious what
>> shenanigans were being played with RTL modifications. I will be prepared to
>> talk about that, briefly.
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 3:29 PM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'll have it sent out soon. Technical problems during CppCon put me
>>> behind schedule a bit.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2021, 12:43 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, Steve. Do you expect to have an updated revision of P2071 available
>>>> for this week's SG16 telecon? If so, please attach or provide a link in a
>>>> reply once it is available.
>>>>
>>>> Tom.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/20/21 3:38 PM, Steve Downey via SG16 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Draft d2071r1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>