C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] The Unicode Standard vs 10646 (which is defective)

From: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 21:02:33 +0100
On 06/11/2021 14.00, Jens Maurer via SG16 wrote:
> I'd suggest use all "control" aliases from NameAliases.txt.

Markus Scherer has confirmed on the Unicode mailing list that
NameAliases.txt is the normative source for aliases for Unicode,
so your table should be based on that.

Unrelated to that, I'll editorially fix the C++ standard to avoid
mentioning abbreviations: https://github.com/cplusplus/draft/issues/5093

Maybe the chat on the Unicode mailing list unveils whether there's
appetite to fix ISO 10646 at some point, so that at least the
format of the code charts is fully specified.


Received on 2021-11-06 15:02:38