std-discussion

Name lookup Russell Shaw (2025-02-26 13:07:24)

• Re: Name lookup Andrew Schepler (2025-02-26 13:36:12)
  • Re: Name lookup Russell Shaw (2025-02-27 00:19:20)
    • Re: Name lookup Jens Maurer (2025-02-27 10:46:32)
    • Re: Name lookup Brian Bi (2025-02-27 15:09:32)
      • Re: Name lookup Russell Shaw (2025-02-28 01:02:47)
      • Re: Name lookup Russell Shaw (2025-02-28 03:04:06)
      • Re: Name lookup Russell Shaw (2025-02-28 04:12:41)

Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? F. v.S. (2025-02-26 01:48:37)

• Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-02-26 10:02:32)
  • Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? Jan Schultke (2025-02-26 10:15:24)
    • Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? Jan Schultke (2025-02-28 08:11:11)
      • Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-03-01 10:01:49)

Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-02-25 11:45:46)

• Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Andrew Schepler (2025-02-25 13:47:12)
  • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-02-26 01:46:03)
    • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Lénárd Szolnoki (2025-03-09 21:31:32)
• Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-03-10 09:36:09)
  • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-11 14:04:00)
    • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Brian Bi (2025-03-11 15:11:34)
      • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Lénárd Szolnoki (2025-03-11 19:51:10)
        • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Brian Bi (2025-03-11 20:00:46)
      • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-12 02:46:56)
        • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-13 04:16:01)
          • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Jens Maurer (2025-03-13 10:00:07)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Brian Bi (2025-03-13 16:00:20)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Lénárd Szolnoki (2025-03-13 20:20:56)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Thomas Köppe (2025-03-15 22:55:06)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-16 09:13:17)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Jason McKesson (2025-03-16 14:48:16)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-03-16 15:53:22)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Jason McKesson (2025-03-16 16:49:13)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Andrew Schepler (2025-03-16 18:01:30)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-18 07:12:50)
            • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-21 11:58:39)
    • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-03-13 15:49:44)
      • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Yongwei Wu (2025-03-14 06:56:41)
        • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Giuseppe D'Angelo (2025-03-14 15:07:28)
          • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Andrew Schepler (2025-03-15 02:46:06)
  • Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? Andrew Schepler (2025-03-11 19:49:25)

how to use ld_preload to intercept c++ program? longguang.yue (2025-02-24 10:01:49)

• Re: how to use ld_preload to intercept c++ program? Thiago Macieira (2025-02-24 14:06:19)

Incomplete pointer type Vladimir Grigoriev (2025-02-17 20:09:08)

• Re: Incomplete pointer type Brian Bi (2025-02-17 21:11:34)
  • Re: Incomplete pointer type Vladimir Grigoriev (2025-02-18 14:14:07)
• Re: Incomplete pointer type Andrey Semashev (2025-02-17 21:16:26)
  • Re: Incomplete pointer type Andrey Semashev (2025-02-17 21:17:12)
    • Re: Incomplete pointer type Andrew Schepler (2025-02-18 05:43:06)
      • Re: Incomplete pointer type Vladimir Grigoriev (2025-02-18 14:25:16)
        • Re: Incomplete pointer type Jens Maurer (2025-02-18 17:42:07)
  • Re: Incomplete pointer type Vladimir Grigoriev (2025-02-18 14:17:51)

C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 09:33:05)

• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Bo Persson (2025-02-17 09:41:57)
  • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 09:47:01)
• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 09:47:15)
  • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 09:49:15)
• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Jan Schultke (2025-02-17 09:47:38)
  • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 09:53:58)
    • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 09:59:13)
      • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 10:09:45)
        • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. mauro russo (2025-02-17 10:13:05)
          • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 10:33:43)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 10:48:27)
        • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 10:41:57)
          • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 11:09:52)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. mauro russo (2025-02-17 11:20:55)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 12:20:14)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 12:43:40)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 13:11:51)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Phil (2025-02-17 12:25:12)
        • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Marcin Jaczewski (2025-02-17 12:19:10)
          • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 12:29:28)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Marcin Jaczewski (2025-02-17 12:53:53)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 13:24:15)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. mauro russo (2025-02-17 13:49:01)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 14:13:11)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Marcin Jaczewski (2025-02-17 14:29:53)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 14:38:41)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Marcin Jaczewski (2025-02-17 14:56:01)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 15:09:07)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Mihail Mihaylov (2025-02-17 14:32:18)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Amit (2025-02-17 14:44:48)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Ville Voutilainen (2025-02-17 14:52:30)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Tiago Freire (2025-02-17 15:06:41)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Marcin Jaczewski (2025-02-17 14:03:54)
            • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Andrew Schepler (2025-02-17 14:10:25)
    • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Jan Schultke (2025-02-17 10:02:26)
      • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Thiago Macieira (2025-02-17 16:03:28)
• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Fabio Fracassi (2025-02-17 10:07:34)
• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. mauro russo (2025-02-17 10:08:59)
• Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Andrey Semashev (2025-02-17 14:15:15)
  • Re: C++ language has a big security hole. Scott Michaud (2025-02-17 19:30:37)

Usable in constant expressions Russell Shaw (2025-02-16 04:02:31)

Wording: load, store, and read-modify-write Yongwei Wu (2025-02-16 03:26:38)

Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Jennifier Burnett (2025-02-15 22:30:22)

• Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Tiago Freire (2025-02-15 23:25:20)
  • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording mauro russo (2025-02-16 01:14:35)
  • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-18 04:41:20)
• Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-15 23:38:33)
  • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Brian Bi (2025-02-16 00:38:01)
    • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-16 01:49:04)
      • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording jenni_at (2025-02-16 02:22:11)
        • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-16 03:34:45)
          • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Brian Bi (2025-02-16 13:03:45)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Jennifier Burnett (2025-02-16 13:21:31)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Jennifier Burnett (2025-02-16 13:40:26)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Brian Bi (2025-02-16 13:45:13)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Jennifier Burnett (2025-02-16 14:01:55)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Brian Bi (2025-02-16 14:17:35)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Jennifier Burnett (2025-02-16 14:22:32)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-18 04:11:41)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Nate Eldredge (2025-02-18 04:44:46)
            • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Brian Bi (2025-02-16 13:41:47)
• Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording mauro russo (2025-02-16 00:18:43)
• Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording Bjorn Reese (2025-02-16 01:11:26)
  • Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording jenni_at (2025-02-16 01:27:33)

Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-11 23:02:52)

• Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Brian Bi (2025-02-15 08:33:08)
  • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-18 22:21:37)
    • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Brian Bi (2025-02-20 02:08:17)
      • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-20 21:14:26)
        • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Brian Bi (2025-02-20 22:19:12)
          • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-20 23:36:51)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Andrew Schepler (2025-02-21 00:41:55)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-21 12:32:35)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-25 00:45:09)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules M.P. (2025-02-25 01:28:14)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-25 09:21:36)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Jens Maurer (2025-02-25 14:54:12)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-25 15:22:56)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Jens Maurer (2025-02-25 21:28:32)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-25 22:51:04)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules Jens Maurer (2025-02-26 22:30:40)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-02-26 23:25:33)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules mauro russo (2025-03-06 11:38:32)
            • Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules M.P. (2025-02-26 19:28:27)

Last message date: 2025-02-28 08:11:11