ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Amit

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 15:09:07)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:44:48)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:38:41)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:13:11)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 13:24:15)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 13:11:51)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:29:28)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:20:14)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 11:09:52)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:33:43)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:09:45)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:53:58)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:49:15)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:47:01)
C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:33:05)

Andrew Schepler

Re: Name lookup (2025-02-26 13:36:12)
Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? (2025-02-25 13:47:12)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-21 00:41:55)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-18 05:43:06)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:10:25)

Andrey Semashev

Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-17 21:17:12)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-17 21:16:26)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:15:15)

Bjorn Reese

Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 01:11:26)

Bo Persson

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:41:57)

Brian Bi

Re: Name lookup (2025-02-27 15:09:32)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-20 22:19:12)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-20 02:08:17)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-17 21:11:34)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 14:17:35)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 13:45:13)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 13:41:47)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 13:03:45)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 00:38:01)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-15 08:33:08)

F. v.S.

Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? (2025-02-26 01:48:37)

Fabio Fracassi

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:07:34)

Giuseppe D'Angelo

Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? (2025-02-26 10:02:32)

Jan Schultke

Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? (2025-02-28 08:11:11)
Re: Should there be a library feature-test macro for std::observable? (2025-02-26 10:15:24)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:02:26)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:47:38)

jenni_at

Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 02:22:11)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 01:27:33)

Jennifier Burnett

Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 14:22:32)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 14:01:55)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 13:40:26)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 13:21:31)
Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-15 22:30:22)

Jens Maurer

Re: Name lookup (2025-02-27 10:46:32)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-26 22:30:40)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 21:28:32)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 14:54:12)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-18 17:42:07)

longguang.yue

how to use ld_preload to intercept c++ program? (2025-02-24 10:01:49)

M.P.

Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-26 19:28:27)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 01:28:14)

Marcin Jaczewski

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:56:01)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:29:53)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:03:54)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:53:53)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:19:10)

mauro russo

Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-26 23:25:33)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 22:51:04)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 15:22:56)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 09:21:36)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-25 00:45:09)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-21 12:32:35)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-20 23:36:51)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-20 21:14:26)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-18 22:21:37)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 13:49:01)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 11:20:55)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:13:05)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:08:59)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 01:14:35)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 00:18:43)
Re: atomic constraint rules vs requires-clause rules (2025-02-11 23:02:52)

Mihail Mihaylov

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:32:18)

Nate Eldredge

Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-18 04:44:46)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-18 04:41:20)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-18 04:11:41)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 03:34:45)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-16 01:49:04)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-15 23:38:33)

Phil

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:25:12)

Russell Shaw

Re: Name lookup (2025-02-28 04:12:41)
Re: Name lookup (2025-02-28 03:04:06)
Re: Name lookup (2025-02-28 01:02:47)
Re: Name lookup (2025-02-27 00:19:20)
Name lookup (2025-02-26 13:07:24)
Usable in constant expressions (2025-02-16 04:02:31)

Scott Michaud

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 19:30:37)

Thiago Macieira

Re: how to use ld_preload to intercept c++ program? (2025-02-24 14:06:19)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 16:03:28)

Tiago Freire

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 15:06:41)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 12:43:40)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:48:27)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 10:41:57)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:59:13)
Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 09:47:15)
Re: Lack of ordering guarantees in shared_ptr wording (2025-02-15 23:25:20)

Ville Voutilainen

Re: C++ language has a big security hole. (2025-02-17 14:52:30)

Vladimir Grigoriev

Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-18 14:25:16)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-18 14:17:51)
Re: Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-18 14:14:07)
Incomplete pointer type (2025-02-17 20:09:08)

Yongwei Wu

Re: Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? (2025-02-26 01:46:03)
Is [[indeterminate]] not applicable to data members? (2025-02-25 11:45:46)
Wording: load, store, and read-modify-write (2025-02-16 03:26:38)

Last message date: 2025-02-28 08:11:11