> This whole thread should have ended in 3-4 post max, but you continue
> it and insist that you know better than others
> what "security" is and what implications it has. If someone sees
> blatantly wrong statements like this, they get angry.
> It was a pointless and unproductive comment on Tiago's side, but
> undestable.
>


If people reply to my replies and offend me then I am going to reply back.

There are many posts in this thread that didn't make personal attack on me
and I didn't reply to them.

The mistake that people make is that they think that they can attack but
they won't be attacked back.

Sadly, this is not true.

Russia attacked Ukraine and Ukraine hit back.

You just can't attack someone and assume that you won't be attacked back.

Regards,
Amit




>
>
>
>
> As I myself contribute to this more and more offtopic discussion,
> I will follow Ville's suggestion and end it here.
>
>
> Have a nice day everyone.
>
>
> >
> > My approach is - when someone doesn't understand what I am saying then I
> don't reply again (as they say, silence is golden). But I don't do persoal
> attacks on that person.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > If Tiago Freire wouldn't have wriiten about when I was born then we
> wouldn't have gotten into this mess.
> >> >
> >> > What's the need to get personal on a mailng list?
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Amit
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 7:19 PM mauro russo via Std-Discussion <
> std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Please, Amit, don't take It personally.
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe, anyone might not be kind, but for sure I see Thiago is just
> trying tò explain.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is not social media.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, again, from inside a process, in assembly, you can access
> whatever you want in your memory, there is no OOP-protection at that level,
> not even any security risk about that.
> >> >> If an hacker has hands in the code (and this may happen... e.g. in
> open source projects), this is not matter of programming language, but of
> development process and SW lifecycle.
> >> >> For your complain, you should ask to HW makers, or OS makers. But
> all here believe that this would not make sense.
> >> >> --
> >> >> Std-Discussion mailing list
> >> >> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> >> >> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Std-Discussion mailing list
> >> > Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> >> > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
>