> Because your post simply shows a lack of understanding of what
> "security" is about.
>

So, this means that if I don't know much about security then people will
make personal attacks on me?

Wow, never thought about this.

My approach is - when someone doesn't understand what I am saying then I
don't reply again (as they say, silence is golden). But I don't do persoal
attacks on that person.

Regards,
Amit





>
> >
> > If Tiago Freire wouldn't have wriiten about when I was born then we
> wouldn't have gotten into this mess.
> >
> > What's the need to get personal on a mailng list?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Amit
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 7:19 PM mauro russo via Std-Discussion <
> std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please, Amit, don't take It personally.
> >>
> >> Maybe, anyone might not be kind, but for sure I see Thiago is just
> trying tò explain.
> >>
> >> This is not social media.
> >>
> >> However, again, from inside a process, in assembly, you can access
> whatever you want in your memory, there is no OOP-protection at that level,
> not even any security risk about that.
> >> If an hacker has hands in the code (and this may happen... e.g. in open
> source projects), this is not matter of programming language, but of
> development process and SW lifecycle.
> >> For your complain, you should ask to HW makers, or OS makers. But all
> here believe that this would not make sense.
> >> --
> >> Std-Discussion mailing list
> >> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> >> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
> >
> > --
> > Std-Discussion mailing list
> > Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
>