Make reference_wrapper have a pointer layout
std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {})
Making bit_cast Useful
std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr
Explode in-place, constexpr
Templated function pointers
Pure value templates
RFC: disjoint qualifier
- Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier
- Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier
- Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier
- Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier
Random: Negative binomial distribution
Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
- Re: Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
- Re: Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
- Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
- Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
- Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions?
why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
- Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits
Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
- Re: Initialisers in ternary operators
P2192 R1 -- request for comments
- Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments
- Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments
- Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments
- Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments
Pack of functions - amendment to P1858
Input should come from the right hand side
std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
- Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant&
Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
- Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
- Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
- Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
- Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
- Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait
Please make string class more powerful
- Re: Please make string class more powerful
- Re: Please make string class more powerful
- Re: Please make string class more powerful
C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed.
- Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed.