std-proposals

Wednesday, 30 September 2020

• Re: Make reference_wrapper have a pointer layout Thiago Macieira
• Make reference_wrapper have a pointer layout connor horman

Monday, 28 September 2020

• Re: std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr Maciej Cencora

Sunday, 27 September 2020

• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Giuseppe D'Angelo

Friday, 25 September 2020

• Re: std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr Michael Scire
• Re: std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr Maciej Cencora
• Re: std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr Maciej Cencora
• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Arthur O'Dwyer

Thursday, 24 September 2020

• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Jason McKesson
• Re: std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Arthur O'Dwyer
• std::take(obj), aka std::exchange(obj, {}) Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: Making bit_cast Useful connor horman
• Re: Making bit_cast Useful Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Making bit_cast Useful connor horman
• Re: Making bit_cast Useful Andrew Giese
• Making bit_cast Useful connor horman
• std::optional - Inconsistency/defect regarding constexpr Michael Scire
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Thiago Macieira
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Thiago Macieira
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Jason McKesson

Wednesday, 23 September 2020

• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Ville Voutilainen
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Jason McKesson
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Jeroen Dobbelaere
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Ville Voutilainen
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Henry Miller
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Rand McRanderson

Tuesday, 22 September 2020

• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Ronan Keryell
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Andrew Giese
• Re: Explode in-place, constexpr Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Re: Explode in-place, constexpr Richard Hodges
• Explode in-place, constexpr Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Templated function pointers Ramkumar Ramachandra

Monday, 21 September 2020

• Re: Pure value templates Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Pure value templates Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Re: Pure value templates Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Pure value templates Barry Revzin
• Re: Pure value templates Garrett May
• Re: Pure value templates Richard Hodges
• Re: Pure value templates Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Re: Pure value templates Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Re: Pure value templates Jason McKesson
• Pure value templates Ramkumar Ramachandra
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)

Friday, 18 September 2020

• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel
• Re: RFC: disjoint qualifier Andreas Ringlstetter
• RFC: disjoint qualifier Eric Lengyel

Thursday, 17 September 2020

• Random: Negative binomial distribution Maximilian Kleinert

Wednesday, 16 September 2020

• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dmitry Dmitry

Tuesday, 15 September 2020

• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Richard Hodges
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Ville Voutilainen
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko

Monday, 14 September 2020

• Re: Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Thiago Macieira
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Thiago Macieira
• Re: Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dmitry Dmitry
• Fwd: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Jason McKesson
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Barry Revzin
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Jason McKesson
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Jason McKesson
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Barry Revzin
• Re: Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Arthur O'Dwyer
• Middle ground between "return" and exceptions? Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Thiago Macieira
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Jason McKesson
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Jason McKesson
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Richard Hodges
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Barry Revzin
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Jorg Brown
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Robert Behar

Sunday, 13 September 2020

• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jason McKesson
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Thiago Macieira
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Nikolay Mihaylov
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Thiago Macieira
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Nikolay Mihaylov
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Thiago Macieira
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Barry Revzin
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Nikolay Mihaylov
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Nikolay Mihaylov
• why does std::basic_string should accept an std::basic_string_view with the same charT and Traits Robert Behar
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dvir Yitzchaki
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dvir Yitzchaki
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jorg Brown

Saturday, 12 September 2020

• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Jason McKesson
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jason McKesson
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Thiago Macieira
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Thiago Macieira

Friday, 11 September 2020

• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jason McKesson
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Christof Meerwald
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Jason McKesson
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Richard Hodges
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Garrett May
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Garrett May
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Richard Hodges
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Bo Persson
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Richard Hodges
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Olaf van der Spek
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Dejan Milosavljevic
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Ville Voutilainen

Thursday, 10 September 2020

• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Jason McKesson
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Jason McKesson
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Eyal Rozenberg
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Simon Kraemer
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Ville Voutilainen
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: Initialisers in ternary operators Ronan Keryell
• Initialisers in ternary operators Dmitry Dmitry
• Re: P2192 R1 -- request for comments Andreas Ringlstetter
• P2192 R1 -- request for comments Dusan Jovanovic (DBJ)
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: Pack of functions - amendment to P1858 Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Pack of functions - amendment to P1858 Fabio Alemagna
• Re: Pack of functions - amendment to P1858 Arthur O'Dwyer
• Pack of functions - amendment to P1858 Fabio Alemagna

Wednesday, 9 September 2020

• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Arthur O'Dwyer

Tuesday, 8 September 2020

• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Input should come from the right hand side Bill Kerney

Monday, 7 September 2020

• Re: std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Andreas Ringlstetter
• std::variant - going from Alternative& to the enclosing variant& Victor Khomenko
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Andreas Ringlstetter

Sunday, 6 September 2020

• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Jason McKesson
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Henry Miller
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Arthur O'Dwyer
• Balanced division of iterator range without LegacyRandomAccessIterator trait Andreas Ringlstetter
• Re: Please make string class more powerful Andrey Semashev

Saturday, 5 September 2020

• Re: Please make string class more powerful Scott Michaud
• Re: Please make string class more powerful Jason McKesson
• Please make string class more powerful Jicun Hu

Thursday, 3 September 2020

• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Nikolay Mihaylov
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Eyal Rozenberg
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Jefferson Carpenter
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Jason McKesson

Wednesday, 2 September 2020

• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Steve Hearnden
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Ville Voutilainen
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which arenot constructed. Steve Hearnden
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Ville Voutilainen
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Ville Voutilainen
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Nikolay Mihaylov
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Ville Voutilainen
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are notconstructed. Steve Hearnden
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Ville Voutilainen
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Jake Arkinstall
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Nikolay Mihaylov
• C++ create a class with array members which are not constructed. Steve Hearnden

Last message date: 2020-09-30 15:38:55