Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 09:05:40 -0700
On Thursday, 10 September 2020 12:13:06 PDT you wrote:
> Last but not least: the proposal is coming a bit late to the party. Unified
> error handling is something which would had been required before libraries
> had established their own standard ways. Now it falls in the line of "There
> are 10 competing standards. That's too many, let's design one which covers
> everyone's needs. Now there are 11 competing standards." There is no chance
> of unifying that aspect in the ecosystem retroactively.
[not to list]
You've got the count wrong. It's 14 competing standards...
https://xkcd.com/927/
:-)
> Last but not least: the proposal is coming a bit late to the party. Unified
> error handling is something which would had been required before libraries
> had established their own standard ways. Now it falls in the line of "There
> are 10 competing standards. That's too many, let's design one which covers
> everyone's needs. Now there are 11 competing standards." There is no chance
> of unifying that aspect in the ecosystem retroactively.
[not to list]
You've got the count wrong. It's 14 competing standards...
https://xkcd.com/927/
:-)
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel DPG Cloud Engineering
Received on 2020-09-12 11:05:45