ISOCPP std-proposals List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Wednesday, 24 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Friday, 19 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy

Thursday, 18 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Magnus Fromreide

Wednesday, 17 December 2025

Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] : stream library [was: Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’] Kim Eloy
AI (was: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’) Alejandro Colomar
[std-proposals] : stream library [was: Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’] Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Kim Eloy
Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Kim Eloy

Monday, 15 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH

Sunday, 14 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar

Saturday, 13 December 2025

Friday, 12 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
[std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
[std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
[std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ Sebastian Wittmeier
[std-proposals] 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ SD SH
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Bjorn Reese
Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 81, Issue 84 叶易安
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? 叶易安
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? Jens Maurer
[std-proposals] Formatting std::exception? 叶易安

Thursday, 11 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Zhihao Yuan
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’ wjf
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Wednesday, 10 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Breno Guimarães
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Filip
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Bjorn Reese
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Jarrad Waterloo
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` wjf
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` wjf
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` JJ Marr
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` codusnocturnus
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Breno Guimarães
Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` Sebastian Wittmeier
[std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl` wjf

Tuesday, 9 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Bjorn Reese
pointers: last vs end (was: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator) Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikolay Mihaylov
Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
[std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent Shivam Kunwar
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikolay Mihaylov
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Thiago Macieira

Monday, 8 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Barry Revzin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Brian Bi
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Bjorn Reese
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE! Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikolay Mihaylov
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikolay Mihaylov
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikolay Mihaylov
[std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator Nikl Kelbon
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki

Sunday, 7 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Henry Miller
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki

Saturday, 6 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] if compiles JJ Marr
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] if compiles Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] if compiles Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] if compiles JJ Marr
Re: [std-proposals] if compiles Jeremy Rifkin
[std-proposals] if compiles Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki

Friday, 5 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally

Thursday, 4 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Lorand Szollosi
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Jonathan Wakely
[std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0 Juan Lucas Rey
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Marc Edouard Gauthier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Bjorn Reese
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose 方晶晶
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Robin Savonen Söderholm
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Marc Edouard Gauthier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally

Wednesday, 3 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Peter Bindels
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics 方晶晶
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics 方晶晶
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Alejandro Colomar
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose Mihail Mihaylov
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose 方晶晶
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics 方晶晶
[std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose 方晶晶
[std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose Jonathan Wakely
[std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics Kamalesh Lakkampally
[std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose 方晶晶

Tuesday, 2 December 2025

Re: [std-proposals] [isocpp-sci] P3935R0 Rebasing <cmath> on C23 Joshua Cranmer

Last message date: 2025-12-24 19:25:38