Wednesday, 24 December 2025
Friday, 19 December 2025
Thursday, 18 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
Wednesday, 17 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- Re: [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
- [std-proposals] std::launder when multiple objects of the same type exist at the same address
Tuesday, 16 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- Re: [std-proposals] : stream library [was: Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’]
- AI (was: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
- [std-proposals] : stream library [was: Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’]
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
Monday, 15 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
Sunday, 14 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
Saturday, 13 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
Friday, 12 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- [std-proposals] 回复: 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- [std-proposals] 回复: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 81, Issue 84
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- Re: [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
- [std-proposals] Formatting std::exception?
Thursday, 11 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
Wednesday, 10 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- Re: [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
- [std-proposals] [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword `undecl`
Tuesday, 9 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- pointers: last vs end (was: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator)
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- [std-proposals] Constant-time selection primitive following memset_explicit precedent
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
Monday, 8 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] std::chimeric_ptr -- it's alive... it's ALIVE!
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- [std-proposals] vector::push_back must not invalidate past-the-end iterator
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
Sunday, 7 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
Saturday, 6 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] if compiles
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] if compiles
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] if compiles
- Re: [std-proposals] if compiles
- Re: [std-proposals] if compiles
- [std-proposals] if compiles
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
Friday, 5 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
Thursday, 4 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- [std-proposals] solution proposal for Issue 2524: generate_canonical can occasionally return 1.0
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
Wednesday, 3 December 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- Re: [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- Re: [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
- [std-proposals] Core-Language Extension for Fetch-Only Instruction Semantics
- [std-proposals] C++ STL List Propose
