Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 09:47:41 +0000
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 22:55, Frederick Virchanza Gotham wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 6:25 PM Jeremy Rifkin wrote:
>
> > Since the motivation relies on extremely heavy use of OOP, maybe
> > discuss how prevalent this is and alternatives to that heavy use of OOP.
>
>
> Isn't OOP to C++ kind of like bouncing a ball to basketball? Honestly
> when I talk about doing OOP in C++, I feel like I'm telling people
> that I use my kettle for boiling water (i.e. obviously I use my kettle
> for boiling water).
>
https://www.stroustrup.com/oopsla.pdf
> > Since the proposal is largely motivated by code size “ballooning” from
> templates,
> > please discuss how significant this issue really is and discuss ICF.
>
>
> I google'ed ICF just now and it came back with a few matching acronyms
> -- which one do you mean?
>
Identical code folding.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 6:25 PM Jeremy Rifkin wrote:
>
> > Since the motivation relies on extremely heavy use of OOP, maybe
> > discuss how prevalent this is and alternatives to that heavy use of OOP.
>
>
> Isn't OOP to C++ kind of like bouncing a ball to basketball? Honestly
> when I talk about doing OOP in C++, I feel like I'm telling people
> that I use my kettle for boiling water (i.e. obviously I use my kettle
> for boiling water).
>
https://www.stroustrup.com/oopsla.pdf
> > Since the proposal is largely motivated by code size “ballooning” from
> templates,
> > please discuss how significant this issue really is and discuss ICF.
>
>
> I google'ed ICF just now and it came back with a few matching acronyms
> -- which one do you mean?
>
Identical code folding.
Received on 2025-12-09 09:48:02
