On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 06:06:19PM +0000, Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals wrote:
> I have signed your guidance in readme file to remind me of this story that you guide me.

Lol; he really put your name in the readme. It says:

 Guided by Jonathan Wakely
 (GCC libstdc++ maintainer and ISO C++ committee member)

Eloy Kim, this is inappropriate; please remove that.

> A moment becomes your student, A life becomes your student.
> Your student
> Eloy Kim
>
> 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ________________________________
> From: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:55:58 AM
> To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
>
> Dear Jonathan,
>
> Thank you again for your feedback. I realised that I need learn too much, the most important is to be polite.
> Thank your for taking time guide for me.
> If I achieved one day, I will sign your name.
> Best regards,
> Eloy Kim
>
> 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ________________________________
> From: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:48:13 AM
> To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
>
> Thanks for your feedback. This committ contains error with constructors and operator reloads implementation. Now I have fixed these problems.
>
> You could write like this to enable 8 multiple threading:
> semantic::from<int>({1,2,3,4,5}). parallel(8). toUnordered().toList();
> I think this way is much better than std ranges, do you think so?
> I design toOrdered/toUnordered, is to give you alternatives between sequence and performance.
>
> I tell you how I understand cpp:
> The class, template and lambda, is something to equals to #define in c language.
> I use atomic to ensure multiple thread during data pipeline.
> I have implementation for template in c language by #define. And I have implementation of JavaScript version.
>
> Your feedback makes me consider problems run on other devices.
> I just have included: array, cmath, random, set, list, mutex, chrono and so on, which just exists on STD libs.
> Yours sincerely
> Eloy Kim
> 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ________________________________
> From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:35:18 AM
> To: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 17:24, Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> Your figures is good point. I ever considered to put all code in a header file called hpp. But I didn't think it was a proper behaviour.
>
> So not a "header-only library" then, as I said.
>
>
> So I separated the code into header file and cpp implementation.
> According to your code example, I doubt you get the code as I committing.
>
> Really? I used this commit:
>
> commit e0d44c3e859d7bb309fd1849ed6d2b825274b7df (HEAD -> main, origin/main, origin/HEAD)
> Author: Eloy Kim <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>>
> AuthorDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800
> Commit: GitHub <noreply_at_[hidden]<mailto:noreply_at_[hidden]>>
> CommitDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800
>
> Implementation for randomly function.
>
>
>
>
> I have been committing GitHub for 3 hours to make sure that all of you could use.
> Now I have committed and make sure all of you could run this project on your computer.
> Thanks for your tolerance, I'm trying to improve all of development experience.
>
> And that' great, I'm glad you're learning. But you should realise that you have a lot to learn and this project is nowhere near suitable for a standard proposal.
>
>
> Now I have made sure that all of you could run this project directly from email files.
>
> As I told you, I'm not using the emails.
>
>
> Your sincerely,
> Eloy Kim
>
> 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ________________________________
> From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]<mailto:cxx_at_[hidden]>>
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 12:51:56 AM
> To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>>
> Cc: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>>
> Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword ‘undecl’)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 15:23, Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> You all only care about AI, instead of professional cpp discussion. I could clearly think your reply is not professional.
>
> I'm not talking about AI, I'm talking about your code.
>
> And, for those syntax errors, you can reply me your compilation arguments and hear file contents. I could easily know you just copy the header file code from email content instead of GitHub.
>
> #include "semantic.h"
>
> int main()
> {
> return semantic::from<int>({1,2,3,4,5}).toOrdered().anyMatch([](auto){ return true;});
> }
>
>
> I don't think you understand what "header-only" means.
>
>
>
>
> If you I could run on my phone with just including std libs and could not run on your computer, I doubt how you learn and use cpp.
>
> Bold claim. So you think you can run the code above on your phone? The functions are not defined in headers, it's not a header-only library.
>
> This is not a "header-only library", it's just some code that has no tests. Don't assume I need to learn C++ to understand this.

> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

-- 
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>