On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 21:38, Alejandro Colomar <
une+cxx_std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 06:06:19PM +0000, Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > I have signed your guidance in readme file to remind me of this story
> that you guide me.
>
> Lol; he really put your name in the readme. It says:
>
> Guided by Jonathan Wakely
> (GCC libstdc++ maintainer and ISO C++ committee member)
>
> Eloy Kim, this is inappropriate; please remove that.
>

Agreed, I don't want my name in there.



>
> > A moment becomes your student, A life becomes your student.
> > Your student
> > Eloy Kim
> >
> > 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:55:58 AM
> > To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> > Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> > Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
> >
> > Dear Jonathan,
> >
> > Thank you again for your feedback. I realised that I need learn too
> much, the most important is to be polite.
> > Thank your for taking time guide for me.
> > If I achieved one day, I will sign your name.
> > Best regards,
> > Eloy Kim
> >
> > 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:48:13 AM
> > To: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> > Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> > Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. This committ contains error with constructors
> and operator reloads implementation. Now I have fixed these problems.
> >
> > You could write like this to enable 8 multiple threading:
> > semantic::from<int>({1,2,3,4,5}). parallel(8). toUnordered().toList();
> > I think this way is much better than std ranges, do you think so?
> > I design toOrdered/toUnordered, is to give you alternatives between
> sequence and performance.
> >
> > I tell you how I understand cpp:
> > The class, template and lambda, is something to equals to #define in c
> language.
> > I use atomic to ensure multiple thread during data pipeline.
> > I have implementation for template in c language by #define. And I have
> implementation of JavaScript version.
> >
> > Your feedback makes me consider problems run on other devices.
> > I just have included: array, cmath, random, set, list, mutex, chrono and
> so on, which just exists on STD libs.
> > Yours sincerely
> > Eloy Kim
> > 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 1:35:18 AM
> > To: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> > Cc: std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> > Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 17:24, Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:
> eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> > Your figures is good point. I ever considered to put all code in a
> header file called hpp. But I didn't think it was a proper behaviour.
> >
> > So not a "header-only library" then, as I said.
> >
> >
> > So I separated the code into header file and cpp implementation.
> > According to your code example, I doubt you get the code as I committing.
> >
> > Really? I used this commit:
> >
> > commit e0d44c3e859d7bb309fd1849ed6d2b825274b7df (HEAD -> main,
> origin/main, origin/HEAD)
> > Author: Eloy Kim <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>>
> > AuthorDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800
> > Commit: GitHub <noreply_at_[hidden]<mailto:noreply_at_[hidden]>>
> > CommitDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800
> >
> > Implementation for randomly function.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I have been committing GitHub for 3 hours to make sure that all of you
> could use.
> > Now I have committed and make sure all of you could run this project on
> your computer.
> > Thanks for your tolerance, I'm trying to improve all of development
> experience.
> >
> > And that' great, I'm glad you're learning. But you should realise that
> you have a lot to learn and this project is nowhere near suitable for a
> standard proposal.
> >
> >
> > Now I have made sure that all of you could run this project directly
> from email files.
> >
> > As I told you, I'm not using the emails.
> >
> >
> > Your sincerely,
> > Eloy Kim
> >
> > 获取Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> > ________________________________
> > From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]<mailto:cxx_at_[hidden]>>
> > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2025 12:51:56 AM
> > To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>>
> > Cc: Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]<mailto:eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>>
> > Subject: Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 15:23, Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]<mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>>
> wrote:
> > You all only care about AI, instead of professional cpp discussion. I
> could clearly think your reply is not professional.
> >
> > I'm not talking about AI, I'm talking about your code.
> >
> > And, for those syntax errors, you can reply me your compilation
> arguments and hear file contents. I could easily know you just copy the
> header file code from email content instead of GitHub.
> >
> > #include "semantic.h"
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > return semantic::from<int>({1,2,3,4,5}).toOrdered().anyMatch([](auto){
> return true;});
> > }
> >
> >
> > I don't think you understand what "header-only" means.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If you I could run on my phone with just including std libs and could
> not run on your computer, I doubt how you learn and use cpp.
> >
> > Bold claim. So you think you can run the code above on your phone? The
> functions are not defined in headers, it's not a header-only library.
> >
> > This is not a "header-only library", it's just some code that has no
> tests. Don't assume I need to learn C++ to understand this.
>
> > --
> > Std-Proposals mailing list
> > Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
>
> --
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
>