Odd: whenever I've posted something for consideration, I've received
quite valuable feedback. Things that I needed to incorporate into
what I'd been working on.

For this thread in particular, you seem to be resisting any attempt at
engaging with your proposal by responding with either single-word (or
short phrase) answers, or just not answering pertinent questions.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:51 AM Nikl Kelbon via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I've been seriously disappointed with this email address (std-proposals) for a long time now and don't see the point in posting here.
>
> It mostly looks like most of the proposals are written by "perpetual motion machine inventors" and the responses are from first-year students. How can anything serious disscussed under these conditions?
>
> It's no wonder I haven't seen a single discussion of anything actually accepted as a standard here.
>
> So I'll close this thread as useless.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals