On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 17:24, Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Your figures is good point. I ever considered to put all code in a header
> file called hpp. But I didn't think it was a proper behaviour.
>

So not a "header-only library" then, as I said.



> So I separated the code into header file and cpp implementation.
> According to your code example, I doubt you get the code as I committing.
>

Really? I used this commit:

commit e0d44c3e859d7bb309fd1849ed6d2b825274b7df (HEAD -> main, origin/main,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Eloy Kim <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
AuthorDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800
Commit: GitHub <noreply_at_[hidden]>
CommitDate: Fri Dec 19 00:05:26 2025 +0800

   Implementation for randomly function.





> I have been committing GitHub for 3 hours to make sure that all of you
> could use.
> Now I have committed and make sure all of you could run this project on
> your computer.
> Thanks for your tolerance, I'm trying to improve all of development
> experience.
>

And that' great, I'm glad you're learning. But you should realise that you
have a lot to learn and this project is nowhere near suitable for a
standard proposal.



> Now I have made sure that all of you could run this project directly from
> email files.
>

As I told you, I'm not using the emails.



> Your sincerely,
> Eloy Kim
>
> 获取Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 19, 2025 12:51:56 AM
> *To:* std-proposals_at_[hidden] <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 15:23, Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> You all only care about AI, instead of professional cpp discussion. I
> could clearly think your reply is not professional.
>
>
> I'm not talking about AI, I'm talking about your code.
>
>
> And, for those syntax errors, you can reply me your compilation arguments
> and hear file contents. I could easily know you just copy the header file
> code from email content instead of GitHub.
>
>
> #include "semantic.h"
>
> int main()
> {
> return semantic::from<int>({1,2,3,4,5}).toOrdered().anyMatch([](auto){
> return true;});
> }
>
>
> I don't think you understand what "header-only" means.
>
>
>
>
>
> If you I could run on my phone with just including std libs and could not
> run on your computer, I doubt how you learn and use cpp.
>
>
> Bold claim. So you think you can run the code above on your phone? The
> functions are not defined in headers, it's not a header-only library.
>
> This is not a "header-only library", it's just some code that has no
> tests. Don't assume I need to learn C++ to understand this.
>