On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 at 08:48, Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is my project readme link:
> https://github.com/eloyhere/semantic-cpp/blob/main/README.md
>

Why are there no tests?

You claim it's a header-only library, but your header file is not usable
because the function bodies are all defined in the same file as the main()
function. This makes it unusable as a library. How is that "header-only"?

You're just showing that you've written a program, which is not very
interesting here. Is there a proposal here that is relevant to this list?
It doesn't seem ready for anybody to use, let alone propose.




> I am the creative person who would never be replaced by Ai.
> semantic-cpp is a header-only, high-performance stream processing library
>

It's not a library.



> for C++17 that combines the fluency of Java Streams, the laziness of
> JavaScript generators, the order mapping of MySQL indexes, and the temporal
> awareness required for financial, IoT, and event-driven systems.
> Example:
> semantic::from({1,2,3,4,5}).reverse(). toOrdered().cout();//5,4,3,2,1
> This is what you can't implement in std::ranges.
> This, is, my, creativity.
> Understand my source code, AI could not do, how about you all?
>
> 获取Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2025 4:19:37 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>; C++ Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
>
> And, I reply to your topic undeclare key word. It's useless, and
> unnecessary. Just as I said, use scope.
> if(true){
> scope variables.
> }
> std:: funtional<void()> task = []()->{
> scope variables.
> };
>
> 获取Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2025 4:14:13 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>; C++ Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
>
> At it could run on my phone, it's enough. I redeclare: I wrote this
> project to optimise development experience. Now I have finished cpp version
> and have been devoting on JavaScript version.
> If you all think I am the Artificial Intelligence, I apologise for using
> them for expressing for me.
> I am just the person experiencing darkness in China. And I don't care how
> world defines me.
> Core type: Generator
> The Generator type is inspired by JavaScript generator function. I use
> generator to transfer functions inside, which is pipeline to transfer data
> and mapped indexes.
>
> 获取Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2025 4:07:44 PM
> *To:* C++ Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Kim Eloy <eloy.kim_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [std-proposals] AI (was: : Re: [PXXXXR0] Add a New Keyword
> ‘undecl’)
>
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2025, 08:00 Kim Eloy via Std-Proposals, <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> You all think too much. This is just a header, I didn't give you cpp file
> for implementations.
>
>
> It's still not valid C++ code though, and so obviously not tested.
>
>
>
>