std-discussion

Andrew Schepler

• Re: C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-24 15:27:13)
• Placement new into static storage violates strict pointer safety? (2019-08-23 22:49:02)

Andrew Tomazos

• Re: Qualified name of an enumerator. (2019-08-28 16:23:42)
• Re: Placement new into static storage violates strict pointer safety? (2019-08-24 04:49:01)

Brian Bi

• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 15:33:25)
• Re: C++ 20. An explicit specialization of a template friend function with a default template argument. (2019-08-28 19:09:00)
• Re: Qualified name of an enumerator. (2019-08-28 16:51:51)
• Re: Clarification needed: block scope thread_locals can be referenced for the first time without control passing through declaration (2019-08-19 17:46:38)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 16:07:00)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 15:23:26)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 14:52:09)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-07 21:16:56)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-07 21:06:10)
• Re: Ambiguity in the definitions of the explicit instantiation declaration and the explicit instantiation definition (2019-08-02 17:45:19)
• Re: Ambiguity in the description of the elaborated-type-specifier. (2019-08-01 16:35:42)

Christopher Hallock

• Re: Safe Integer Types (P0228R0) (2019-08-03 00:58:36)

Daniel Krügler

• Re: Clarification needed: block scope thread_locals can be referenced for the first time without control passing through declaration (2019-08-19 16:43:46)

Daniel Markus

• C++ Error Handling and Out of Execution Resource (2019-08-12 16:51:19)

David Svoboda

• Safe Integer Types (P0228R0) (2019-08-02 18:11:02)

Dmitry

• Re: C++ Error Handling and Out of Execution Resource (2019-08-14 20:18:01)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-09 19:42:57)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-08 20:41:06)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-08 19:37:05)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-08 18:42:35)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-07 20:10:19)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-06 09:53:45)
• Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-05 08:45:13)

Domen Vrankar

• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-06 09:49:56)

Federico Kircheis

• Re: Safe Integer Types (P0228R0) (2019-08-03 04:48:56)

FrankHB

• Some questions about comparison objects in [associative.reqmts] (2019-08-18 17:20:00)

Hyman Rosen

• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-29 15:28:57)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 23:55:07)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 19:05:19)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 18:32:52)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 18:09:14)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 18:01:58)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 15:35:39)

John McFarlane

• Re: Safe Integer Types (P0228R0) (2019-08-03 11:28:24)

Krystian Stasiowski

• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-29 00:17:25)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 22:01:38)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 18:53:54)
• Expression equivalence for template loading (2019-08-16 23:03:33)

Language Lawyer

• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 15:23:47)

language.lawyer_at

• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 18:13:54)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 17:14:04)
• Re: Placement new into static storage violates strict pointer safety? (2019-08-24 12:16:19)
• Re: Placement new into static storage violates strict pointer safety? (2019-08-23 23:00:41)

Lyberta

• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-09 18:27:00)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-08 20:36:00)

Maris Razvan

• Re: Header unit importation syntax (2019-08-25 10:30:51)
• Re: Header unit importation syntax (2019-08-24 05:36:41)
• Re: Header unit importation syntax (2019-08-23 21:41:03)
• Header unit importation syntax (2019-08-23 21:12:52)

Michael Spencer

• Re: Header unit importation syntax (2019-08-23 21:43:20)

Princeton Ferro

• Re: Clarification needed: block scope thread_locals can be referenced for the first time without control passing through declaration (2019-08-22 13:51:44)
• Re: Clarification needed: block scope thread_locals can be referenced for the first time without control passing through declaration (2019-08-19 17:38:22)
• Clarification needed: block scope thread_locals can be referenced for the first time without control passing through declaration (2019-08-19 16:22:03)

Roman Odaisky

• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 19:34:05)
• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 18:43:14)
• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 18:35:50)
• Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 14:28:54)

sdkrystian

• Values of objects (2019-08-26 02:22:25)
• Re: Temp.deduct.type applicability (2019-08-05 04:36:17)
• Re: Temp.deduct.type applicability (2019-08-05 04:35:18)
• Re: CTADs and equivalent parameter list (2019-08-04 14:13:54)
• Re: Ambiguity in the definitions of the explicit instantiation declaration and the explicit instantiation definition (2019-08-02 15:47:24)

Tadeus Prastowo

• Re: C++ Error Handling and Out of Execution Resource (2019-08-13 10:08:47)

Thiago Macieira

• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-06 22:42:37)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-06 05:16:29)

tobi_at

• CTADs and equivalent parameter list (2019-08-04 09:39:18)

Tom Honermann

• Re: C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-24 03:55:00)
• Re: Using declaration with a parameter pack of bases constructors. (2019-08-23 14:29:31)

Tony V E

• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 22:18:24)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 21:44:03)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-28 17:02:44)
• Re: Values of objects (2019-08-26 05:53:46)
• Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed? (2019-08-08 19:06:05)

Ville Voutilainen

• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 18:55:57)
• Re: Possible defect: unneeded const in lambda capture (2019-08-29 18:40:20)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 18:43:31)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 15:30:44)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 15:26:00)
• Re: Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 15:19:29)

Vladimir Grigoriev

• C++ 20. An explicit specialization of a template friend function with a default template argument. (2019-08-28 17:24:52)
• Qualified name of an enumerator. (2019-08-28 16:19:54)
• Re: C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-24 11:16:16)
• using declaration. template default argument. One more bug of gcc? (2019-08-23 15:35:21)
• Using declaration with a parameter pack of bases constructors. (2019-08-23 11:01:47)
• C++ 20. The using declaration with a specialization of a template conversion operator. (2019-08-21 17:06:31)
• C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-21 15:41:25)
• Contradiction in the description of the pack expansion (2019-08-16 14:05:29)
• Fwd: Requires expressions: local parameters (2019-08-09 12:12:59)
• Requires expressions: local parameters (2019-08-08 09:09:02)
• Ambiguity in the definitions of the explicit instantiation declaration and the explicit instantiation definition (2019-08-02 15:31:51)
• Ambiguity in the description of the elaborated-type-specifier. (2019-08-01 13:38:56)

Will Hawkins

• Re: C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-24 09:46:36)
• Re: C++ 20: Member templates. Is there a typo in the following example? (2019-08-24 02:28:54)
• Re: Temp.deduct.type applicability (2019-08-05 21:12:08)
• Temp.deduct.type applicability (2019-08-05 03:27:30)

Last message date: 2019-08-29 19:34:05