Subject: Re: Are Exceptions deeply flawed?
From: Lyberta (lyberta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-08-09 13:27:00
>> std::error is much better than std::expected.
> Can you elaborate, please?
It doesn't use RTTI so it has the same cost as std::expected yet allows
to separate success and failure like current exceptions. I don't see a
reason to have std::expected in the standard if we gonna get std::error.
STD-DISCUSSION list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Older Archives on Google Groups